Talk:Alexander Grychtolik

Content biography

This discussion was begun on Bax4aa74's talk page. I have been following the editing war going on over the length of this article. As Gerda Arendt explained, this article was recommended for deletion, so there was an extra effort made to expand it, verifying everything, so that others would see the merits of the article, that the subject is notable and worthy of a page. These efforts were successful and the article was not deleted. It is possible that shortening the article may put it in danger of again being recommended for deletion.

Aside from that, big editorial changes on articles that have more than one active editor are done by consensus. This article qualifies as such a group effort. If you have legitimate reasons for wanting to make certain deletions, present your arguments and let people weigh in on them, supporting or opposing your proposals. Bax4aa74, you must abide by the consensus. That is how things are done at Wikipedia. Edits that persist in opposition of the consensus are considered vandalism. In that case, there are steps that can be taken, such as protection for the article and/or blocking the account of the vandal/s. Please explain your reasons for wanting the article to be less detailed. Keep in mind that doing research on Google is the primary way of getting verification for the articles on Wikipedia, so your complaint about the article being a collection of things found on Google is actually a compliment. Thank you!

If your position is that the article is slanderous or maligns the subject, please see Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject). Keep in mind, this article is the result of a consensus, so such a claim will have to be proven and cannot simply be asserted.

For your convenience, I have linked several Wikipedia articles to this post so that you can read about Wikipedia rules and policies. This may prove helpful to you when wondering what you should do to avoid problems with your account or in your dealings with other Wikipedians. When you reply, please remember to sign your posts so that it's clear who they're coming from. You sign them by typing 4 tildes like this: ~~~~ and the system will automatically leave your Wikipedia name, a link to your talk page and a time stamp. Please see WP:SIG for more information. Marrante (talk) 13:27, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alexander Ferdinand Grychtolik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321135315/http://www.sophien.de/pages/kulturbuero-sophien/kulturkalender.php?monthno=3&year=2010 to http://www.sophien.de/pages/kulturbuero-sophien/kulturkalender.php?monthno=3&year=2010

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:07, 30 June 2017 (UTC)