This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of the Roman and Byzantine Emperors WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Roman and Byzantine emperors. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roman and Byzantine emperorsWikipedia:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsTemplate:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsRoman and Byzantine emperors articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The article is perhaps excessively unfavourable to Alexius (not that he was much of a hero). Some additions regarding his life before 1195 may help ... Andrew Dalby10:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
I was merely updating the article on the basis of the pre-existing entry, based (I think) on the 11th edition of Encyclopaedia Britannica, but I could be wrong. Yes, it sounded less than completely objective, but was reluctant to change too much. As for Alexios in captivity at Antioch, the situation is as follows: following his participation in the failed conspiracy against Andronikos I, Alexios Angelos fled abroad, seeking asylum in various Muslim states, and eventually Egypt. When Isaac II sent envoys to announce his accession to Saladin, the envoys met Alexios Angelos there, and made a treaty with Saladin. Alexios Angelos set out for home, but was apprehended and detained by Count Raymond III of Tripoli because of the treaty. How he found his way to Antioch (and whether this particular detail is accurate), I do not recall--perhaps there is confusion due to the later association of the Principality of Antioch and the County of Tripoli. Eventually Isaac II ransomed him from the Latins in Outremer (or perhaps more accurately bribed Pisan merchants in Tripoli) and brought him home. Imladjov19:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks very much, Imladjov. I had forgotten, or never learned, all that. And, yes, I realised the original phrasing of that sentence had been taken over from an earlier version of the article. Andrew Dalby20:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
