This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Yahoo Sports spells his name "Álex Ríos," with an accent in both names. This would fit Spanish pronunciation rules. On the other hand, he was born in the U.S., and, according to us, his full first name is "Alexis." Does anyone know for sure whether the "A" should have an accent? -- Mwalcoff22:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Pretty sure it doesn't need it. The first syllable is always stressed unless there is an accent on subsequent syllables, so accenting the first A is redundant and incorrect. Why Yahoo insists on doing this is beyond me. Evan Reyes (talk) 20:08, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Despite his full name being Alexis Rios, I think the name of the page should be Alex Rios. I think he used to go by Alexis but I think he has just shorten it to Alex now. -Street2004:52, 27 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
"Its fine", is a great argument for completing the move without consensus or discussion, however we haven't reached the matter at hand here. As far as arguments go, the obvious one should be how did you determine "Alex" is more common than "Alexis" before blindly moving, because some announcer called him so? Well, "Alexis" is used a lot more commonly in the media that has been covering his career years before he was a MLB player, as a matter of fact its rare seeing the nickname "Alex" in these newspapers. Want an recent example? here is an article from El Nuevo Día, Puerto Rico's leading newspaper, written four days ago. As you can see here lies the point, there is no clear "common name", thus there shouldn't be undiscussed moves. - Caribbean~H.Q.20:27, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Is there a good reason to have this section? It seems awfully unencyclopedic. Perhaps those items, if people think they're noteworthy, could go into other sections.CSHunt68 (talk) 23:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply