Untitled

edit

Several websites claim that he was born in 1901, including imdb http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0000055/—Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.82.16.50 (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rrrramdam! Rrrramdam! RrrrRrrrRamdam!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.115.129.76 (talk) 16:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please see preceding edits and talk page. The 1900 date has been confirmed again and again!Rozsaphile1 (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Number of nominations

edit

According to the Academy's offical records (the database is at Oscar's offical website), Newman's nominations for 1937 (for "The Prisoner of Zenda" and "The Hurricane") are not officially counted as nominations for Newman. Consequently, according to the Academy, Newman was only officially nominated 43 times. see: http://www.oscars.org/awardsdatabase/ --Dole2007 29 September 2007 (UTC)

--The Academy bestowed nominations on the composers who's scores where nominated during that time, thus Newman has 43 Nominations and 2 Honoree Nominations making 45. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.173.88 (talk) 17:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Demetrius and the Gladiators

edit

Isn't Demetrius and the Gladiators score by Franz Waxman ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.162.138 (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Son of Fury

edit

It`s incredible that in the article there´s not a word about "Son of Fury", perhaps the most beautiful and ambitious work of Alfred Newman. The score is edited in CD, and it´s difficult to find a cinematographic score of these quality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lincoln R. Maiztegui Casas (talkcontribs) 06:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Date of birth

edit

Alfred Newman's date of birth is given as 17 March 1900 by

all of which are more authoritative than the IMDB. A date of birth in 1900 is also consistent with the statement later in this Wikipedia article that "Newman died on February 17, 1970 exactly a month before his 70th birthday".

While it is true that his memorial plaque at Forest Lawn Memorial Park in Glendale reads "1901-1970", the most definitive evidence is that he appears in the 1900 US Census, age 2 months, New Haven, Connecticut, Ward 4, sheet 5. Had he been born in 1901, he could not have appeared on that census, at all. I realize that this is from a primary source, but it provides irrefutable clarification of which secondary sources are correct and which are incorrect. It should be noted that the obituaries from AP and UPI at the time of his death, which appeared in hundreds of newspapers across the country, were incorrect. The LA Times got it right. LineChaser (talk) 23:22, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fred Steiner, who worked with Newman and wrote a dissertation on his early development, gives 1900 in the Dictionary of American Biography (Supplement). Therefore I've reverted the date to 1900.Rozsaphile1 (talk) 03:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Conundrum

edit

Can an editor expand the curious apparent contradiction of "a time when composers were not eligible to be nominated in the score category" to render the conundrum intelligible?--Wetman (talk) 02:43, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Alfred Newman (composer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Change picture to a more recent picture

edit

A picture of the man as a young boy doesn't represent how he looked in his prime or how most would picture him. 2603:8001:4F00:A0F:119D:331E:4079:11BB (talk) 08:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I agree! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I would assume it was chosen because its in public domain. Still though, it's rather bizarre and I'm sure we could find a non-free file rationale for a later photo... Aza24 (talk) 21:52, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 25 August 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


– Legendary film composer, who had been nominated for a record 45 Academy Awards, was the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC from the date of his article's creation (8 April 2004) until 31 August 2012 when the main title header was unilaterally moved to Alfred Newman (composer). There are eight entries listed upon the Alfred Newman disambiguation page, with the composer likely to have greater renown than the combined notability of the remaining seven entries. As extreme comparison, there are 157 entries upon the John Williams (disambiguation) page, with the film composer listed as the primary topic over the remaining 156 entries. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 21:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.