Suggested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. I'm considering this uncontroversial. After over a month, we have only the nominator in support and no one in opposition. --BDD (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)Reply

All-Ukrainian Union "Fatherland"Batkivshchyna – More recognizable title. "Fatherland" is not using in sources. Only Batkivshchyna. For example, official twitter: Batkivshchyna on Twitter. --Relisted Tyrol5 [Talk] 02:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC) NickSt (talk) 13:31, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on All-Ukrainian Union "Fatherland". Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on All-Ukrainian Union "Fatherland". Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn’t the position be Syncretic?

edit

Shouldn’t the position be Syncretic? In the list of ideologies it says Christian Democracy and Social Democracy so wouldn’t this be fiscally centre-left and socially centre-right Fantastik2323 (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Christian democracy is not socially conservative by default, they may have more liberal or even progressive views. This is also not how syncretic politics works. If they were socially center-right and fiscally center-left, that would more or less make them centrist as a whole. Syncreticism would require their policies to be too diverse to place them on any one place on the political spectrum. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:27, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply