Talk:All TV

Requested move 22 September 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to All TV. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

---

All TV (Philippines) → All TV (Philippine TV network) – proper naming, like with TV5 (Philippine TV network), GTV (Philippine TV network), etc. RapMonstaXY (talk) 09:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 17:39, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

• Disagree The branding has only one other notable network with the same name which is a Korean-Canadian TV network. We can apply an expanded distinction if there were five or more notable ones with Wiki articles KuyaStephenAlaEH (talk) 10:45, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
• Support The name connects the slogan Your New Network. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 11:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
• Oppose We could be specific on the country that is originated, not adding the type of company. --Pinespunned (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
• Oppose or Move to All TV I wrote in the NCBC rewrite, Where it can be reasonably expected that all of the articles with the same base name will be of the same type, e.g. radio stations named "Fresh FM" or television channels with the name "Disney Channel", disambiguation can be done by country. That is often a reasonable expectation when "TV" is in the name, as it is here. In re: the rationale by KuyaStephenAlaEH, if there were 15 or 20 entries for TV channels named All TV instead of two and there wasn't a profusion of unlike topics like "All TV (film)" to spoil the bunch, I still would be saying this. However, I also note that this is exceedingly likely to become a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the topic All TV on pageviews; this page gets in an hour what the Canadian specialty channel gets in 30 days (61,884 vs. 56 in 30 days), and even if the newness of this channel wears off, the fundamentals point toward PRIMARYTOPIC status here. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
• Move to All TV. Although pageviews will likely come back down to Earth over time, it seems safe to say that this article is primary over the minor Korean-language channel in Canada. 162 etc. (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
• Comment: Moving to All TV may increase the chances of this being primary over the Canadian TV Channel. RapMonstaXY (talk) 10:34, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: A new suggestion to move this to All TV has been floated. Relisting to generate consensus. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 17:39, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

• Support per SeanJ 2007. DraggyWiki (talk) 23:43, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  • LOL his reasoning did not even make sense. Howard the Duck (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• Move to All TV. Originally planned to vote "support" its move to All TV (Philippine TV network) per WP:NCBC, however, with the rationale of Sammi Brie above took a lot of confusion about the disambiguating scenario on the "same or similar names but with a different identity type of" networks (e.g. TV5 and other channel, network or station names with disambiguation uses), its best to make the proposal name as an redirect to this aforementioned page. Although, moving to All TV is currently the best option to move from the current name as per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC stands. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 14:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
• Move to All TV, clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here. Howard the Duck (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.