Talk:Allopanishad

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Hinduism

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

All the names of Upanishads have a meaning in Sanskrit.

Allo Upanishad has no meaning at all. This itself proves it is bogus.... right? --121.246.158.79 (talk) 07:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC) True to AllahReply

People trying to show other religons are copies and bad religons are doing a lot of damage to their own religon.One should read and practice all religons and select the best,but one needs a long time to understand it completely.Even if you follow your own religon properly you will not need another one.So please dont damage and criticise others and have confidence in your own faith.All the best.

Link this article to the end of everything. --GuruNanakDKesh101 (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wonder why people want to confuse things? The "Allopanishad" is a book of doubtful origin and the wiki entry is misleading. The "Atharva Veda" does not mention this book at all! While "Googling", I noticed that some sites are citing the "wiki reference" to be valid!

I've made a few changes and further written that "this is a book of dubious origin". If anyone has any kind of updates/changes, please discuss in the talk page and then make the changes. I cannot help agreeing with the above comments from the user "GuruNankDKesh101". freewit (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic