Talk:Alphonsus Liguori

(Redirected from Talk:Alphonsus Maria de' Liguori)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by TywysogMelyn in topic Case of bilocation

Biased Presentation

edit

I agree that Liguori is an important character. I have come to this article looking for neutral information but was disappointed: the article reads like an apology and dwells largely on an adoring view. Assorted links could help to look up what is meant by a Catholic Saint, a Doctor of the Catholic Church, a Catholic "spiritual writer", a Catholic Congregation, etc. In the Catholic Encyclopaedia Liguori is presented in extenso with no pretense to be neutral; the corresponding external link is missing. --Lupo Manaro 09:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

It might help if you would elaborate on what 'neutral information' would be, or what is problematic about this content other than lacking definitions of terms that are common in Christian scholarship. I think it is straightforward to look up terminology, e.g. by simple Internet searches. -- Newagelink (talk) 09:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Saint Alphonsus' cassock

edit

I'm curious, on some pictures of Saint Alphonsus, why are his cassock and mozzetta blue? I'm pretty sure that blue was never a colour for cassocks -- only white, red, purple and black were permitted. I thought it might be the colour of Saint Alphonsus' order's habit, but I don't think the CSSRs ever had blue. Saint John Neumann was a bishop too, and all I've seen him in was either a black cassock (I think it's a Jesuit-style cassock?) and the black Bishop's cassock.J.J. Bustamante 11:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Complete name

edit

Alphonsus Mary Antony John Cosmas Damian Michael Gaspard de' Liguori ...should his complete name be in the article? It's in the italian wikipedia.
Sources:


Soulrefrain 03:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good to me. Carl.bunderson 19:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Great! Kindly check out how I placed the complete name in the article and please provide comments. Thanks. Soulrefrain 00:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
I think it turned out great. Thanks, Soul. Carl.bunderson 21:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Case of bilocation

edit

Why isnt the incidence of bilocation, reported here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ mentioned in this page? It seems like such a miracle should be mentioned someplace in the article.

Sorry to reply as many as 14 years later, but to be clear, this anonymous internaut has linked to the homepage of Wikipedia. Let anyone with a source for claims of Liguori's bilocation make the appropriate edit! TywysogMelyn (talk) 12:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alphonsus Maria de' Liguori. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 4 September 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved DrStrauss talk 14:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply



Alphonsus Maria de' LiguoriAlphonsus Liguori – Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:USEENGLISH, the common name for the saint is simply Alphonsus Liguori in the English-language literature. See the N-grams [4] for evidence here. The current title is not found at all in the English corpus, and while the usage of Maria is sometimes found in titles of books, the n-gram usage makes it very clear the the preferred English here is simply Alphonsus Liguori. The addition of saint would be unnecessary because he lived at a late enough time where he can clearly be established by his first and last name in English without the honourific. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alphonsus Liguori. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply