Talk:Alum Rock, San Jose

County/City statement out of date

All areas between White and Capitol have been annexed as of 11/15/2010. See the reference and pocketmap2 as a cross-reference map. Most of the area east of White remains county land with no immediate plans for annexation. I'd update but I'd rather someone more familiar with the area did. Foxyshadis^(talk) 19:35, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alum Rock, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alum Rock, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://factfinder2.census.gov/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080212014627/http://www.sanjoseca.gov/district5/ to http://www.sanjoseca.gov/district5/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

district vs CDP

Alum Rock the district of San Jose, and Alum Rock the census-designated place are different things, and this article conflated the two. I tried fixing the conflation by separating the infobox into one containing the pictures (none of which where from the CDP) from everything else (all of which refered specifically to the CDP), and clarifying in the demographics section that it was about the CDP, even though most of the rest of the article was about the district of San Jose. But this is a bit sloppy, and really, there should be separate articles for each of them. Unseemly Levity (talk) 19:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)