Talk:Democracy promotion by the United States

Did you know?

This article should be eligible for appearing on the main page as a "Did you know" entry, if it is nominated it soon; it is supposed to be nominated within 5 days of being created or significantly (5x) expanded.

The instructions for nominating it are at Template talk:Did you know. Basically, all you need to do is take this code:

{{NewDYKnom| article= | hook=... that ? | status=new | author=  }}

and write the hook, a concise and interesting bit of info from the article beginning with "... that" and ending with a question mark. The info from the hook has to be present in the article and supported (in the article) with a citation. Someone will double-check to make sure the source says what it's claimed to say.

Once you've come up with a hook, fill in your username as the author and fill the title of the article, then add the above code, including your hook following the "hook=" part, to the top of the appropriate section for the day the article was started on the DYK template talk page. The code will produce an entry formatted like the others. After that, just keep an eye on the entry; if anyone brings up an issue with it, try to address it. I'll keep an eye out as well. If everything goes well, it will appear on the Main Page for several hours a few days from now.

--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 02:59, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Err, nevermind, it looks like it has already been nominated. So just keep an eye on it, and hopefully it will end up on the main page soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 03:18, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Wonderful, thanks so much Sage! Is there a way to track whether it has appeared on the page or not, in case I miss it while it's up there? (Ya7abibi24 (talk) 13:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC))

If you check the nomination here; someone will either approve it or bring up concerns about it within the next few days. After that, it will get removed from that page and added to the queue. Once that happens, there is a table that gives a rough idea of when it is likely to appear on the main page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 23:00, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Suggestions

This article is really quite thorough and detailed and should be commended for its organization (good outline structure) and depth of research (reliable, scholarly sources). I thought it was high quality and overall great. Still, I offer the following suggestions for you to consider if you wish.

• American vs. U.S.--my personal preference is to use the "United States" or "U.S." to describe the government and country's policies (in the sense that it is an actor) and to use American as an adjective when modifying nationality or something. If you do not want to change your use of the word American, I recommend adding a "re-direct" link so that people who search in Wikipedia for "U.S. democracy Middle East" will find your article. At present, your article will not come up in such a search.
• I recommend moving the section listing U.S. institutions doing democracy work (section 4) to be before the section on the priorities of those organizations (section 3). That way you see who is doing the work, and then what is that they are doing.
• I was curious when you mention DG indicators, as in what is used to assess the progress towards 'democratization' what are those indicators and how are they measured? Could you include this somehow?

Again, great job! I thought this was a very informative article. Kmac1986 (talk) 02:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi! I have never edited a Wikipedia page (and I'm in the midst of finals so I don't have time) but saw the notice about expanding from MENA region... I just read this article and think it could begin the work to expand, if someone is interested in working on that: https://americandiplomacy.web.unc.edu/2008/01/a-democracy-building-success-story/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.195.130.35 (talk) 20:59, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

comments

Excellent organization and sourcing and a clear layout of the material. The sections on history and critiques are particularly well done and lay out the issues at hand. Nice work. Radavis147 (talk) 15:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Overall Assessment

I have to agree with the above comments in that this article is overall very well-written and well-organized. There is also a notable attempt made to maintain NPOV and a host of citations from a variety of sources that really lend credibility to this article. You might want to consider rewording the title, I apologize for not having any suggestions myself, because it does seem a bit long and wordy. I like the above suggestion to use U.S. in place of American. I noticed that you have a small section devoted to criticism of the Bush administration with regards to democratization, but notice that there is no such section for the Obama administration. In an effort to maintain NPOV, I would suggest adding in such a section. I also notice that you spend a large amount of space listing all of the NGOs, IGOs, and think-tanks that do work related to democratization, yet you only expand on the work of the U.S. government. This article would greatly benefit from a section that explains in greater detail the role that American civil society plays in democracy promotion. It would also be useful to lay out what the U.S. considers as criteria for measuring success/ failure and then assessing some of the examples you have given in the article. A minor detail, but I think this article could also benefit from the addition of a few more pictures. Overall a quality article. If you are feeling ambitious you should consider expanding the article to just general U.S. Democracy Promotion, as the United States has engaged in democratization not only in MENA, but all over the globe. IR393ldc211 (talk) 02:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on American democracy promotion in the Middle East and North Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101020010942/http://www.usaid.gov:80/our_work/democracy_and_governance/ to http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110730080403/http://www.washingtonmonthly.com:80/features/2005/0505.clark.html to http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0505.clark.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402041517/http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=53289 to http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=53289
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101007210620/http://www.ned.org/publications/annual-reports/2009-annual-report/middle-east-and-north-africa to http://www.ned.org/publications/annual-reports/2009-annual-report/middle-east-and-north-africa

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American democracy promotion in the Middle East and North Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705115001/http://www.hooverdigest.org/042/bdm.html to http://www.hooverdigest.org/042/bdm.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 3 July 2017 (UTC)