Talk:AMS-Osram

Archives (Index)

2010 2016 2018

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Requested move 5 December 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 15:07, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

---

Ams AG → Ams-OSRAM – With the Acquisition of Osram, the company renamed itself to ams-OSRAM. This is not just a rebranding, the official company name is now "ams-OSRAM AG" (see https://ams-osram.com/imprint) and also the swiss stock exchanges lists the company as "ams-OSRAM" (see https://www.six-group.com/de/products-services/the-swiss-stock-exchange/market-data/shares/share-explorer/share-details.AT0000A18XM4CHF4.html#/). The German Article has alredy been moved some months ago. Strohmi93 (talk) 16:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:26, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 31 January 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 09:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

---

Ams-OSRAM → AMS-Osram – per MOS:TMRULES ("Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization practices, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting 'official'"), specifically MOS:TMRULES ("Using all-caps is preferred if the letters are pronounced individually") for the "ams" plus MOS:TMLOWER ("...trademarks promoted without any capitals are capitalized like any other") for "OSRAM". The latter matches the Osram article as well. The proposed spelling is used with some frequency in independent sources.[1][2][3][4] —  AjaxSmack  05:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.