Talk:Online Streaming Act
(Redirected from Talk:An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act (43rd Canadian Parliament, 2nd Session))
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kingsif in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | A fact from Online Streaming Act appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 May 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 20:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that amid concerns that Bill C-10 would classify users of online video platforms as broadcasters, Canadian MP Julie Dabrusin said that "we do not want to regulate your cat videos"? Source: CTV News
- ALT1:... that Canada's Bill C-10 has faced criticism for potentially classifying social media services as broadcasters? Source: CTV News
- Reviewed: Cuddles Marshall
Created by ViperSnake151 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC).
This article was split off from Broadcasting Act (Canada), but as far as I can see, the initial text has largely been rewritten, so I am classifying it as new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:43, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
