Talk:Anarchist Federation (Britain)

Untitled

This article is in need of reliable third party sources as per WP:SOURCES and WP:ABOUTSELF. Sections of the article without sources are candidates for deletion. Æthelred (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Notice: This article does not verifiably establish WP:CORP

In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for Organizations and companies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of third-party sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones, or self-published sources) suggests to some editors that multiple independent reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:Libleft (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it … I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings … I apologize if some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. Category:Flagged articles — Æthelred (talk) 15:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

It's hard to disentangle this group from others with similar names, but the following searches might help

• Google Scholar Anarchist Federation +AF
• GS for "Anarchist Communist Federation ACF

--Peter cohen (talk) 16:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

---

Hi, I do not claim ownership over this article nor am I the original creator of this article, I have however contributed to it. I feel that the Anarchist Federation, being the largest anarchist organisation in Britain deserves to be represented in this encyclopaedia for educational and historical purposes. Obviously this alone does not mean that it complies with the notability criteria for organisations. It has however been referenced by different groups, for example; the British Library includes "Resistance", the paper of the Anarchist Federation on their online catalogue: http://catalogue.bl.uk/F/N1Q3DUYS2G6KYJDVMM7L19RM9KS2P53DX838DM7JR4ADTY4LAP-79027?func=full-set-set&set_number=089007&set_entry=000006&format=999 Additionally, the Anarchist Federation has been mentioned in third party news sources, such as the Daily Mail here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/news/article-1555714/Square-Mile-on-May-Day-alert.html From the Telegraph here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8127332/Student-tuition-fee-protests-police-failed-to-monitor-anarchists-internet-chatter-planning-violence.html There are many other references also, however they may not be what you may consider 'reliable' as most do not fit into the criteria of 'interest group' in the sense that they do not lobby governments for socio-economic change but see them as a hindrance to their struggle. Would these references have to be included in the actual article itself? Thanks for flagging this up for my attention though and sorry for the late response. -- Libleft (talk 17:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

• As the article has survived an AFD and been improved, I've removed it from the flagged article category by adding a colon to the template. – S. Rich (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anarchist Federation (Britain and Ireland). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130513210238/http://www.afed.org.uk/org/issue42/acf10yrs.html to http://www.afed.org.uk/org/issue42/acf10yrs.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130425145254/http://www.afed.org.uk/organisation/international-iaf-ifa.html to http://afed.org.uk/organisation/international-iaf-ifa.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060306173227/http://www.iaf-ifa.org/ to http://www.iaf-ifa.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anarchist Federation (Britain and Ireland). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071103194751/http://afed.org.uk/ireland/ to http://afed.org.uk/ireland/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060306173227/http://www.iaf-ifa.org/ to http://www.iaf-ifa.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20151211120213/http://manchesteraf.org/aims-and-principles/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 13:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)