Talk:Xyp9x
(Redirected from Talk:Andreas Højsleth)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Requested move 27 April 2021
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 27 April 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vaticidalprophet 00:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Andreas Højsleth → Xyp9x – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Pbrks (talk) 03:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)—Relisted. 2pou (talk) 16:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose zɪpɛks redirects to real name anyway. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- That doesn't invalidate WP:COMMONNAME. He is far better known by Xyp9x (268,000 results) than Andreas Højsleth (34,300 results). Pbrks (talk) 16:44, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support the numbers appear to stingily support the claim that the proposed title is the common name and I don’t see it’s already a redirect as a relevant rational to oppose.--65.92.163.98 (talk) 22:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.