Talk:Anglo-Iraqi War
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 31, 2012, May 31, 2014, May 31, 2016, May 31, 2018, and May 31, 2022. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Grammar
editSorry if I appear a pedant, but the grammar use of was and were needed correction.
Conflicting Rutbah Info
editI have a source at my disposal, The Story of the Arab Legion, written by John Bagot Glubb "Pasha Glubb" who was actually there, which conflicts with the current information written in the "Rutbah" section of this page. My source suggests that there were roughly 100 police occupying the garrison when they arrived, and only a few of these were Iraqi Desert Police. It also says that the bombing began on the 8th May when the Arab Legion originally arrived. And it was on the evening of the 9th May when a support column arrived, consisting of roughly 40 vehicles. Half of these were under the command of Fawzi al-Qawuqji, whereas half of them were Iraqi Desert Police. It certainly does not suggest that Fawzi al-Qawuqji was already at the fort before the 9th May, and it also imperatively states that only a "few" of the original garrison were Iraqi Desert Police, the rest being local police. The section also fails to mention the involvement of Michael Casson and his No. 2 RAF Armoured Car Company in taking the fort. They are the explanation of why the Iraqis suddenly just up and abandon the place.
Is it all right for me to change the section, as long as it is sourced properly, as it is my belief that my source is more likely to be correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewdwilliams (talk • contribs) 14:30, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- If there are conflicting versions, it might be best to put both. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:32, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Recent edit
editFew and exiguous aren't synonyms.Keith-264 (talk) 09:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anglo-Iraqi War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081220222048/http://assyrianlevies.com/gpage8.html to http://assyrianlevies.com/gpage8.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.ibiblio.net/hyperwar/UN/UK/LondonGazette/37703.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anglo-Iraqi War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070621120847/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/rsepResources/si/dec02/middleEast.asp to http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/rsepResources/si/dec02/middleEast.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
A suggestion.
editI believe the addition of information regarding Iraqi military personnel (I.e., photographs, commander's biographies, military equipment, etc.) would help the article greatly, as such, if anyone finds photographs of Iraqi soldiers or lists of their weapons, information regarding commanding officers or the likes, please add it to the article. If no one else will, I'll see what I can do. Unfortunately, for about half a week, I will be busy and thus unable to add anything to the article, as such, if no one adds this in 3-4 days, I'll accept responsibility over the task and will attempt completion.