Talk:Ann Arbor, Michigan
This article is undergoing a featured article review. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria.
Please feel free to If the article has been moved from its initial review period to the Featured Article Removal Candidate (FARC) section, you may support or contest its removal. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ann Arbor, Michigan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
Ann Arbor, Michigan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 5, 2008. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from Ann Arbor, Michigan was split to Transportation in Ann Arbor, Michigan on 4 August 2024 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Material from Ann Arbor, Michigan was split to Economy in Ann Arbor, Michigan on 4 August 2024 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Channel outage.
editTwice in two days same approximate time channel goes out. No weather problems. Is your people who can't do their jobs? 2601:406:4D02:2C60:C156:8577:1EF5:C2C9 (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, while I understand that the electricity problem in AA is upsetting (and needs to be fixed!), Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and isn't the place for that discussion. ——267 07:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
"Ace Deuce" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect Ace Deuce has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Ace Deuce until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:URFA/2020 and WP:FA concerns
editI am reviewing this article as part of WP:URFA/2020, an initiative to improve English Wikipedia's older featured articles. I have some concerns with this article, which I am outlining below:
- Information has been added to the article since it's FAR that is too detailed for an article of this scope. This includes much of the information about various issues in the "Politics" section, much of the Sports section, the 2010 census data and information in the "Economy" section.
- The "Infrastructure" suffers from MOS:OVERSECTION.
- There are several uncited passages throughout the article.
Is anyone interested in fixing up this article on this article? Z1720 (talk) 03:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Started copyediting the article. There would be a lot of summations and adding citations. I do have a concern about the "Politics" section as a lot of it appears to be from recent years. Is there a good way to handle this? PentawingTalk 03:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think most of the Politics section can go, as it is not usually mentioned in this much detail in city FAs. Hamilton, Ontario is my recommendation as an example of how a government section should be formatted. Z1720 (talk) 03:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- 'Update:' Summarized the "Economy" and "Transportation" sections. I am still the process of clearing "citation needed" tags and addressing the lead. PentawingTalk 04:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- 'Update:' I think I have taken care of every issue listed as well as updated statistical data. Is there anything else that needs to be addressed? PentawingTalk 05:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Dioxane and groundwater
editThere is a passage concerning dioxane in the "Utilities" section, but the citation is merely from a county information update that looks like any regular update that a county government would put out for the benefit of residents. Hence, I don't know if this is worthy of being in the article. For now, I have moved the passage in question to the talk page.
- A plume of the industrial solvent dioxane is migrating under the city from the contaminated Gelman Sciences, Inc. property on the westside of Ann Arbor. It is currently detected at 0.039 ppb.[1] The Gelman plume is a potential threat to one of the City of Ann Arbor's drinking water sources, the Huron River, which flows through downtown Ann Arbor.[citation needed]
PentawingTalk 04:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "1,4-Dioxane | Washtenaw County, MI". www.washtenaw.org. Archived from the original on December 15, 2020. Retrieved December 15, 2020.