Talk:Ann Voskamp
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 December 2022. The result of the discussion was Speedy keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ann Voskamp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.zondervan.com/Cultures/en-US/Authors/Author.htm?ContributorID=VoskampA&QueryStringSite=Zondervan - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322142352/http://www.babble.com:80/mom/work-family/top-mom-bloggers-full-list to http://www.babble.com/mom/work-family/top-mom-bloggers-full-list/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Article issues, February 2020
editI gave the article a once-over, checking citations, correcting and completely those flawed citations that could be readily done, and setting all the bad web sources up for filling bythe reFill team. I also began checking text to source, and made minor content edits so the text here says what those sources say (no more, no less). The tags that are placed are the minimal—noting what content I found in the lead, infobox, and main body that are without justification by source, and after that calling attention to the global issues remaining. I understand that this is an author that has been highly regarded in her circles and among her readers. She is deserving of careful editing, and full compliance with WP:VER and WP:OS. The route to GA status—besides wide and careful reading and summarizing of the secondary and scholarly sources—is attention to the real issues that each article presents. As a former academic, I've indicated what I think they are, here.
Thanks in advance to the reFill team for the hard work they do to fix bad web citations. Cheers, all. 2601:246:C700:19D:E443:4C25:B2A0:E36 (talk) 07:54, 28 February 2020 (UTC)