Talk:Anthony Cary, 5th Viscount Falkland
(Redirected from Talk:Anthony Cary, 5th Viscount of Falkland)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by JackofOz in topic Why does he alone have "of" in his title?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anthony Cary, 5th Viscount Falkland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Anthony Cary, 5th Viscount Falkland be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Why does he alone have "of" in his title?
editSee this page move from 2006. I also note the following:
- Theoretically all viscountcies in the Peerage of Scotland have "of" in their titles, but most Scottish Viscounts have dropped the practice of using "of." The only ones who persist in the usage of the word are the Viscount of Arbuthnott, and, to a lesser extent, the Viscount of Oxfuird.
So, why is this guy "Viscount of Falkland", while all his predecessors and successors are just "Viscount Falkland"? Should not the "of" be either applied to all the Falkland viscounts (on technical grounds) or to none of them (on practical grounds)? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)