Talk:Anti-bureaucratic revolution
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anti-bureaucratic revolution article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mihalj Kertes
editHow can you Serbs be afraid of Serbia when I, a Hungarian, am not afraid of Serbia?
His name would be according to Hungarian spelling Kertész Mihály. For a short period the Hungarian press used this form of his name, but later - up to the present day - even the Hungarian press uses the form Mihalj Kertes. The point is that he cannot be treated as ethnic Hungarian, and the main reason is that he can't speak even a single word on Hungarian. According to the Hungarian logic, "the nation lives in his languange", so a person who doesn't speak a word in Hungarian is not a Hungarian. (So in Hungarian nation not the citizenship, not the religion and not the origin matters, but the language.)
The second, a more symbolic reason why he is not Hungarian is that he has always used his name as Mihalj Kertes. In some time only the Serb form of the name was allowed to be used in Yugoslavia, but Hungarians has always been using the Hungarian form of their names, regardless if it was accepted officially or not. If he were a "real" Hungarian, then it would be very likely that he would use the Hungarian form of his name.
Fcsaba 14:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I mostly agree; however, that were his own words, which were largely (ab)used by the Milošević's media of the time as a sort of proof that the "people's movement" is based on ideas of equity and justice rather than nationalism. FWIW, his trial started just today [1]; I assume you arrived here because it intrigued your curiosity and you performed the search. Too bad that he doesn't have an article... he's such a... um... colorful person. Duja► 15:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- I couldn't resist making the article... his biography could take volumes... Duja► 15:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Prelude: Milošević's rise to power
edit| This topic is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. The section or sections that need attention may be noted in a message below. |
This article has a verification needed tag in a section, and the source comes from an article which requires access from a library or institution. If somebody can get to the page please verify and remove tag. JacobiJonesJr (talk) 22:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Anti-bureaucratic revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131213053210/http://www.fvv.uni-mb.si/varstvoslovje/Abstract.aspx?cid=329 to http://www.fvv.uni-mb.si/varstvoslovje/Abstract.aspx?cid=329
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)