Talk:Aerial yoga

(Redirected from Talk:Anti-gravity yoga)
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Strangerpete in topic No references for originator claim

untitled

edit

Aerial Yoga is yoga practice with an aerial yoga swing/hammock. It is not about Yoga Alliance or any brand. Antigravity, Airo, Aireal, Fly High, Aeroyoga are all part of the aerial yoga practices. Saying one of them is the practice is like say that yoga practice is Manduka because that is the brand of the mat someone is using. Some aerial yoga swing brands might have their own teaching methodologies but the bases are the same. Also, it is difficult to determine when this practice was born. The most similar practice from traditional yoga is from Iyengar and the kuruntas. Teachers in differetn parts of the world have been exploring aerial yoga without even knowing about the brands or the people who called themself the first ones. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:448A:506C:2070:792F:A044:3A11:CA56 (talk) 05:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Anti gravity

edit

Anti gravity is a form of aireal yoga. Not the type of yoga. Look at the yoga alliance’s page on the subject. Anti gravity isn’t accredited. Aireal yoga is, and anti gravity is a form of it. Wikioditor (talk) 03:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wp promo page

edit

This entire page is obvious WP:PROMO and not permitted here. You are also engaged in an edit war and well past WP:3RR. Qzd (talk)

Anti gravity is a brand name. Not the type of yoga. See yoga allliances website. Left in ref. Wikioditor (talk) 03:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

No references for originator claim

edit

There are no sources here that back up Carmen as the creator, and the first citation claims creation of aerial yoga in 2005 by someone else. Strangerpete (talk) 02:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The claim was added by an SPA user named CarmenCurtis, with no evidence added at that time. I've removed the claim. Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, embarrassingly I didn't check the log and assumed it had been in place a while; should have just reverted it myself! Strangerpete (talk) 12:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply