Talk:First of October Anti-Fascist Resistance Groups
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the First of October Anti-Fascist Resistance Groups article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about First of October Anti-Fascist Resistance Groups. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about First of October Anti-Fascist Resistance Groups at the Reference desk. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
editAccording to the FAS, this group had only a few dozen members, as of 2003. An organization that small can hardly be said to have both a "political wing" and a "military wing": it's clearly just one tiny group of people (tinier still, after recent arrests [1]), and GRAPO and the PCE(r) are clearly a single entity. -- Karada 20:16, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- The articles ought to be separate. All claims as to the size of clandestine organizations might be disputed, but 2003 numbers cannot be the defining issue. GRAPO did play a role during the latter years of the Franco regime, and the PCE(r) and GRAPO are both significant to have separate articles. --Soman 12:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Total neutrality failure...
editThis article is an aberration. All sources are hostile to the subject, the language is biased, there is much SYNTH and OR speculation, soem of the claims are not verifiable, and terms such as "band" are clearly not neutral. Perhpas only the few lines in the intro are neutraly presented, but then they are not sourced... can't win! We surely can make a better job of this world shattering topic. ;) Thanks! --Cerejota (talk) 03:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
It is not a maoist group.
this is much more acurate:
Comunismo, socialismo marxismo-leninismo, antirrevisionismo
For doing this crap it is better to copy&paste the spanish one — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.120.36.244 (talk) 12:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on First of October Anti-Fascist Resistance Groups. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060213122701/http://www.guardiacivil.org/terrorismo/grupos/lista.jsp to http://www.guardiacivil.org/terrorismo/grupos/lista.jsp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111226121106/http://www.libertaddigital.com:6681/noticias/noticia_1276307643.html to http://www.libertaddigital.com:6681/noticias/noticia_1276307643.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
The link sourcing GRAPO being labeled as terrorist according to The UE does, not work. A valid link must be found or the mention withdrawn.--Lembeye (talk) 18:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)