Talk:2016 Al-Kazimiyya Mosque bombing
(Redirected from Talk:April 2016 Baghdad bombing)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Beejsterb in topic Injuries
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of 2016 Al-Kazimiyya Mosque bombing be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Please see:
- http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/iraq-turmoil/baghdad-state-emergency-after-supporters-al-sadr-storm-green-zone-n565266
- http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/01/world/middleeast/iraq-protesters-storm-parliament-demanding-end-to-corruption.html?_r=0
- http://in.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-iraq-politics-idINKCN0XR0CR
- http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-iraq-green-zone-breach-20160430-story.html
Baking Soda (talk) 21:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- 1. BRD means you get consensus BEFORE re-reverting.
- 2. You've shown sources merely talkin about the incident alone. There are other listed sources that do draw a parallel.
- 3. You are not AGF by asserting "most likely" to make an affirimative claim.
- 4. You have made no point of discussion here other than asserting/re-gurgitating your belief.Lihaas (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Kindly present sources claiming protests are a reaction to bombing... Baking Soda (talk) 21:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Any updates? going ahead with merge in a while assuming no opposition to merge. Baking Soda (talk) 13:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Injuries
editSome sources state that there was two separate attacks, and 51 were injured. [1]
It seems that other sources group the two attacks into one attack and that 42+ were injured, or are they just using new data from one attack and not including the other? [2]
New source seems to clear things up again. I will edit the article to include the new data.[3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beejsterb (talk • contribs) 18:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
References