Talk:Architecture of the Song dynasty

Missing Academy architecture

zh version has a section on academy architecture, which is missing here. North Song dynasty had four famous academies. The Song Yang Academy at Henan Dengfeng city is now a World Heritage Site. Pity missing here--Gisling (talk) 08:31, 15 November 2011 (UTC).

对不起， 我的汉语不好。 I can't read that article, I'd need someone who could read fluently, both the article and the sources, in order to get that information in. Said person would also have to want to spend a good deal of time working on the article. I'll keep it in mind, as it does need to be addressed if this is ever to be taken to FAC, however right now I don't have the resources to work on that. I suppose that it should be said that I still believe that this is a top quality article that paints a pretty complete picture, the most complete you'd be able to get before going into academic books. Sven Manguard Wha? 11:01, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Architecture of the Song dynasty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100206060659/http://www.chinaculture.org:80/gb/en_travel/2003-09/24/content_33014.htm to http://www.chinaculture.org/gb/en_travel/2003-09/24/content_33014.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Architecture of the Song dynasty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070806144733/http://www.chinaculture.org/gb/en_travel/2003-09/24/content_36209.htm to http://www.chinaculture.org/gb/en_travel/2003-09/24/content_36209.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Architecture of the Song dynasty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071010221329/http://www.theantiquariansociety.com/tasbase/home/siteview.php?id=29 to http://www.theantiquariansociety.com/tasbase/home/siteview.php?id=29
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090818043351/http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/3/10/11/n391995.htm to http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/3/10/11/n391995.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Good article reassessment

Architecture of the Song dynasty

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: kept no evidence provided that the article does not meet the GA criteria. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

A GA from 2011. There's a bad amount of uncited material that needs to be cited. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

• As the article contains general references, it only requires inline citations for statements of the five types mentioned in GA criterion 2b, Onegreatjoke. Thus, I think keeping the article works, unless evidence of OR or similar emerges. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.