Talk:Ashton, Stalybridge and Liverpool Junction Railway

Untitled

I can see little justification for this railway having a separate article. It was only in existence for less than three years; it then became part of the M&LR - which does not have an article, since the existing one, for no apparent reason that I can see, was moved to become the L&YR!!!! - which then became part of the L&YR. The L&YR was itself the amalgamation of a large number of constituent railways, only one of which was the AS&LJR. I am sure that the majority of the others do without an article - so why this one? Peter Shearan 11:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

The AS&LJR was an important line, forming part of the present day principal line between Manchester and Leeds. A number of things have changed since the above commentary was written: the M&LR does have its own article. Contrary to the assertion above, the AS&LJR didn't become part of the M&LR. In 1847 the L&YR was formed from two existing railways, the M&LR and this one; a third constituent was under construction and had not been opened. Afterbrunel (talk) 12:33, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ashton, Stalybridge and Liverpool Junction Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050410094226/http://www.railwayancestors.fsnet.co.uk/research.html to http://www.railwayancestors.fsnet.co.uk/research.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)