Talk:Assiniboine

Indigenous peoples of North America High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Montana

	Montana portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Manitoba / Saskatchewan Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Manitoba.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.

Ethnic groups

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Move discussion in progress

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Chipewyan people which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 21:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assiniboine people → Assiniboine – target is a dab page created as such by Mjazac on Aug 4 2005. the people page was started as "Assiniboine" on Jan 29 2005 by 69.26.28.56 then moved by Kwami over redirect to "Assinboine people" on Jan 15 2011 contrary to WP:UNDAB. Of what's on the dab page the people are the PRIMARYTOPIC (the river is debatable as a PRIMARYTOPIC but it already has "river" in its title, and the target should be moved to Assiniboine (disambiguation) and the people page moved back to where it belongs at Assiniboine... why the people article is separate from Nakoda people I haven't looked into yet; a merge may be called for - ?? Skookum1 (talk) 04:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Oppose until the issue is addressed properly. These should be discussed at a centralized location.

There was a discussion once on whether the ethnicity should have precedence for the name, and it was decided it shouldn't. That could be revisited. But it really should be one discussion on the principle, not thousands of separate discussions at every ethnicity in the world over whether it should be at "X", "Xs", or "X people". — kwami (talk) 12:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom. An identified people should be the primary topic of a term absent something remarkable standing in the way. bd2412 T 02:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Support as per the policy Wikipedia:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names and the guideline Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes). There is no need to redo any guideline as it already supports the un-disabiguated title. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 04:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Subgroups and Bands

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The Subgroups and Bands section is really hard to read. The short entries are straightforward, but the longer descriptions are seriously run-on sentences, with many subclauses. I'm really bad about using parentheticals, but these are too complex even for me to read. I've tried doing some tidying for comprehensibility, but since I don't know the subject it's sometimes hard to parse out the original intent. This section would really benefit from attention by someone with knowledge of the subject and really good writing skills. Have at it!

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 16:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

So far you are doing fine. To the extent that you have sources, check what they say, and for what's unsourced, take your best shot; I've got a pretty good eye/ear for something that goes too far amiss, but I don't have the time to do a lot of research... so go for it and I'll lurk if you go overboard! ;-) Montanabw ^(talk) 09:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Assiniboine/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Some content, but really only a stub; has pic; language article already separate. Skookum1 - May 12, 06

Last edited at 21:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC). Substituted at 08:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Assiniboine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Assiniboine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070616184924/http://www.boatnerd.com/pictures/fleet/cslassiniboine.htm to http://www.boatnerd.com/pictures/fleet/cslassiniboine.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://lewisandclark.state.mt.us/Assiniboine.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/cultural/northamerica/assiniboine.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.montana.edu/wwwfpcc/tribes/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic