Talk:Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business/Archives/2016
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Latest members
Listing founding members makes sense, but I can see no justification for listing "latest members". What would make sense is if we listed them all. This ccould be done with copyvio by organizing the data appropriately. DGG ( talk ) 01:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- I agree. Audit Guy (talk) 05:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Untitled
"In addition to accrediting schools around the world in both business and accounting, the association also is the professional development organization for the business education community, conducting a wide array of conference and seminar programs at various locations around the world. For students seeking the a quality business education and companies seeking high-caliber business talent, one of the most important criteria to consider is international accreditation. By choosing an AACSB-accredited school, students can be sure they have access to high quality faculty, continually updated curricula, and real-world relevance that prepares student for the job market. Prospective employers know that graduates of AACSB-accredited schools are prepared to perform"
This sounds like an advertisement vs. an encyclopedia entry....
Why is it that the AACSB is deemed superior to other business school accreditations? Is it because business schools originated in the USA? Or, is it a historical prejudice, borne out of the fact that AACSB is nearly a century old? This only serves to undermine the efforts of the institutions that qualify for different accreditations. An example of an accreditation that is "unrecognised" by AACSB is the European Quality Improvement System, which itself has rigorous standards.
Conflict of interest
At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)