Talk:Canada (AG) v Lavell

'

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Bill of Rights"

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In the attached article there is a mention of the "Bill of Rights", a concept not present in Canadian law. Rather than the American Bill of rights we have a Charter of Rights and Freedoms I wish to highlight this to someone who knows enough about the subject to change it. Thanks, Sandy Arlockhart 01:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Actually if you read the article Canadian Bill of Rights you will see that Canada does infact have a bill of rights that is entirely separate from the Charter. -PullUpYourSocks 01:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Article Assesment

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Rated the article "B" class today, as it appears to satisfy the B-Class criteria. PK T 12:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

1973 or 1974

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

~~There is a conflict between the infobox and the categories.~~ Ottawahitech (talk) 18:19, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I changed the category to conform with the infobox. Ottawahitech (talk) 19:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Canada (AG) v Lavell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic