Talk:Environmental Defenders Office

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Environmental Defenders Office is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The article had been up only a few minutes. Give me a couple of days to add more meat. The importance of this network can be seen from looking at some of the cases handled by just one office: [NSW EDO cases] dinghy (talk) 13:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sure, I'll leave it for now per the discussion we had about the other article you created. As before, feel free to contact me if you need any help. Ironholds (talk) 13:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks dinghy (talk) 05:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I am familiar with ANEDO's work. Notability should be able to be established, but I wouldn't rely on existing casework so much as some past case outcomes and public profile, lobbying role. Good luck dinghy. Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hopefully have done enough to keep the article intact. However, I still suggest that current cases should not be convered in the article. It needs some third party reports (law reports, non-ANEDO newsletters) of results of concluded cases in which ANEDO had a role. Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 23:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on EDOs of Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic