Talk:Awe
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2013. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)/Psychology 220A (Fall, 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
 | Awe was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 4, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that there is controversy over whether non-religious people can experience the emotion of awe? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Comment
editSeems a pretty clear candidate for a wikipedia page to me, given that there are individuals pages for many many other emotions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomascochrane (talk • contribs) 12:01, April 6, 2008
- I suggest you leave a comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awe (emotion). Hut 8.5 13:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Awesome used for different purposes
edit"Awesome" is often used for nuanced purposes, and I've yet to see it explained somewhere. If you want to appear to be praising someone for their actions (theatre performance, parental advice to the youngsters, speech, America's Got Talent) the word is used. Gee, you were awesome gets to be used and overused to death, and hides the lie.
Romney's acceptance speech was awesome. So will be Obama's. The word covers your subtext, especially if your true response would be decidedly the opposite of approval. Yes, it's a useful word, and also a hypocritical word. But this cannot be put into the article (original research?)
So remember, smile a lot, hand over the flowers, and say "You Were Awesome!" JohnClarknew (talk) 18:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Editing Awe entry
editHi there. I plan to make some major additions and minor edits to the Awe page. Here is a link to the sandbox where I'll be working on it, in case anyone wants to see it and make comments:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Call_me_Lucy/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template%3AUser_sandbox%2Fpreload&editintro=Template%3AUser_sandbox&redlink=1 Call me Lucy (talk) 19:14, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Awe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://americanscientist.org/articles/01articles/Plutchik.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
May/Might
edit Etymology: Might —> may: why the former? ... since “may have” suggests we can’t sure who is would be inspired, or that the impressive arc may have been missed by all, bcz it was 4 am? “Might” in this context suggests ”‘Lan’a don’ ‘llow no sissies”, or that the photo may be a fake, with a lab-created arc and a LEGO model.
—JerzyA (talk) 02:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Awe
editHow can a emotion desroy the hool word by saying Awe, this emotion is not a real emotion no emotion can tarn the word apart no as people we shoid be nice to one other so this emotion can not tarn the word apart. Millon years ago Dinassor dis apard and no one envestingation what happen millon years or the samething live in water the coverment need to help our lives or people will die because of derty water if the coverment wants that's so that's okay but one thing I am saying is people are dieng on EARTH And happy FREEDOM DAY every one love you all By:Awethu Mkhosana ∆ A,M 41.116.242.31 (talk) 21:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
New book on Awe
editThe newly published book Keltner, Dacher (January 3, 2023). Awe: The New Science of Everyday Wonder and How It Can Transform Your Life. Penguin Press. p. 336. ISBN 978-1984879684. is a valuable reference on this topic. It will be helpful to improve this article based on the findings in that new book. Thanks! Lbeaumont (talk) 23:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
The Matryoshka Model of Awe
editThe Matryoshka Model of Awe is a new analysis of the various properties of awe. It is described in the paper The Potential Role of Awe for Depression: Reassembling the Puzzle, Alice Chirico, Andrea Gaggioli, Frontiers in Psychology, April 26, 2021. This article may be improved by including insights from that model Lbeaumont (talk) 14:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)