Talk:BATM

(Redirected from Talk:BATM Advanced Communications)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sumanuil in topic False claim of merger

Proposed merge of Telco Systems into BATM Advanced Communications

edit

Per rationale on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vigilant Technology gidonb (talk) 20:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 09:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 March 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed move request. (closed by non-admin page mover) CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talkCL) 12:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply


BATM Advanced CommunicationsBATM – Per WP:CONCISE. Short name is BATM. We have no other BATM article. BATM presently redirects to BATM's long name. This should be the other way around. gidonb (talk) 21:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 00:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Companies has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 00:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Technology has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 00:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Telecommunications has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 00:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

False claim of merger

edit

There was false claim here dated March 2022 and there were false claims in edit summaries at article Vigilant Technology, that that article was merged to BATM article. The claim was a lie, there was no merger done. I restored that article just now. However, there was an AFD discussion somewhere which might have decided a merger would be appropriate. So perhaps merger tags should be added, or someone should perform a merger. To editor User:Klbrain and others who ever are involved in calling for or implementig mergers, please pay attention for editors who merely redirect when a substantial merger is instead needed, and please help identify and address the situations (with blocking or whatever. Don't just be complicit, please. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 05:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Editor User:Sumanuil, please discuss here. In my humble opinion, editor Sumanuil just showed they also do not understand the difference between deleting & redirecting vs. performing a proper merger, by reverting my restoration of the article. I restored it again. Discuss here, or if not, don't damage anything more, please. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 06:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

As I said, I didn't "delete" anything. It's all still there in the history. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:31, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply