Talk:BR-319 (Brazil highway)

Partial users attack this article

I replaced text brought from the Wiki in Portuguese, written mostly by the user Naldo Arruda, who lives in the Amazon region (therefore, has much more reliability to write about this BR than any user who lives outside Brazil and only reads biased information and partial by the world press), was supervised by Wiki administrators in Portuguese and the version there is considered neutral and informative enough not to be disputed by anyone.

Here, there was a compendium of a lack of information or misinformation, an abundance of bias with text written only by people interested in tackling the ecological issue, with a complete lack of relevant information elsewhere. Information is used from private eco-Shiite organizations such as Greenpeace and several others whose vision is unique and narrow, which Wikipedia does not care to propagate. Wikipedia values ​​the neutrality of articles and they must address all fields of vision, not just the ecological. Ecological users have come here and in other articles, thinking that they own the articles they are interested in (and become violent when other users are interested in editing the article), threaten other ban users by creating purposeful editing wars, propagate misinformation, fill the article with information not relevant to the topic and delete information that is pertinent. Serious Wikipedia users ask the administration to monitor organizations that attack this and other articles en masse, even with suspicion of possible payment of wages to their members to edit Wikipedia, the largest source of information in the world, which is free to edit and has much more global reach than the blogs of their organizations. Thank you and make sure that Wikipedia does not become a mere blog of angry and blind ecologists. Rauzaruku (talk) 16:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Funny how you come here and threaten me immediately: on my talk page. And that the article has had this content for years, by editor not directly involved in Brazil... so not buyin the argument at all. Especially when the sources in the current version are much higher quality than government and right-wing sources. Sadads (talk) 16:51, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Better try to read the whole article brought from Wiki pt, because you didn't even read it: you deleted everything without reading it because you don't care about the article talking about the 4.6 million people who live in the region, just the trees. The truth is that a resident outside Brazil knows nothing about the subject, and his level of writing on a local subject will never compare to that of those who live in the region. So, it would be good to stop acting as OWNER OF THE ARTICLE because you are not. And do you know anything about the sources I put in? They are all reliable, otherwise they would not be on the pt wiki. Rauzaruku (talk) 16:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, doesn't work that way.... please use sources with a reputation for high quality information... which the current Brazilian government does not have. And also continuing to threaten me is not helpful, Sadads (talk) 17:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Who would you be to judge that the government of a country is not a reliable source? First of all, within the government there are civil servants of all political strands. You didn't really read anything, right? You are proving that you did not read the text, did not check sources, did nothing, erased without reading just like any vandal IP. In fact, speaking like this already demonstrates your partiality in relation to the subject: you hate the president of Brazil, so you edited it out of hate. Rauzaruku (talk) 17:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Its funny how the actions of leaders create reputations about misinformation. Also, please stop throwing accusation of partiality around when its clear you have an ideology that leads you to attack people, Sadads (talk) 17:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)