Talk:RKM code

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transwiki

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This article is probably better off in Wiktionary, as it is merely a definition and not an encyclopedic entry. Tanthalas39 (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

On second though, maybe not. Not sure... just expansion and cleanup, I guess. Tanthalas39 (talk) 05:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Here are a few historically interesting questions not answered by the article yet and thus needing further research:

Was there a history of the RKM code prior to its standardization in IEC 62:1952 in 1952? It isn't mentioned in Buttner's handbook in the 1943 and 1946 editions (not checked later editions). Does this indicate that the notation was freshly invented for IEC 62:1952? By whom?
In the AWS/JAN tolerance code, the letters G, J, K, M were used for the tolerances 2%, 5%, 10%, 20%. Why were exactly these letters chosen and not some others? Why did the AWS/JAN specs not already include letters for 1% (F?) and 3% (H?)? What have been the exact names of those AWS/JAN specs?