Talk:Principality of Bitlis

Kurdistan Low‑importance

	Kurdistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries: Ottoman Empire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

„Rojaki“ name

Why isn‘t the name of this page „Rojaki dynasty“ as it is mention in the article? It was ruled and named by the Rojaki tribe, not?

Bitlis = Badlis

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Bitlis = Badlis : these two towns are one, there should be only one article, --Hope&Act3! (talk) 20:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Do not let facts interfere with nationalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.77.162.40 (talk) 04:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

The reference I removed does not exist, there is one entry called Bedlis and it describes Bitlis in Turkey. So the articles need to be probably merged. --Stultiwikia^{text me} 22:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per request. - GTBacchus^(talk) 00:12, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Badlis → Principality of Bitlis – per WP:COMMONNAME & WP:USEENGLISH

-- Takabeg (talk) 01:42, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Faulty premise with regards to 1665: no Murad VI ever reigned the Ottoman empire

The article states: "In 1665, Abdal Khans status as the Emir of the principality was strengthened after a visit to Bitlis by the Ottoman sultan Murad VI as he supported the Ottomans in the feud between the ottomans and the Safavids" This is impossible as there was never a Murad VI, and the closest Murad (IV) whgi was reigning to 1665 was Murad IV who died over two decades earlier. The next and last Murad (V- ruled briefly in the second part of the 19th century (over 200 years later). In 1665 the ruling sultan was Mehmed IV! Either the year or the sultan (or both) are thus clearly wrong. This part of the article clearly must be somewhat rewritten but I do not have the necesssary knowledge of the region's history to correct it. Could someone please correct it? -- fdewaele; 22 December 2020, 17:11 CET.

Add topic