Talk:Bang Bang!
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bang Bang! article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
Bipasha
editWhere's Bipasha's name ???????????????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.226.252.188 (talk) 09:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi sir I am so excited for acting please sir Suraj spidy patidar (talk) 18:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Box office section
editThere seems to be a disagreement over what that section should contain. One editor changed it in this edit with an edit summary. Another changed it back with no edit summary. So, I reverted to the version with the edit summary explanation. I have invited both parties here to discuss things. Please work it out here before changing the article again. Many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your kind invitation. Box Office India's figures are used in every film's boxoffice section. Sorry, I didn't give explanation for my edit. Perhaps you should tell Raj2991 that Wikipedia is not the place to favour your favorite star. That's why he's manipulating collections by following some other trade magazine. Why? Box Office India's figures are not enough for him? Why doesn't he have problem with Box Office India when it comes to other films' boxoffice? Why manipulate Bang Bang's figures only? Please revert it to my edit. Thanks. Armaan.haider (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
BOX OFFICE INDIA figures are highly erroneous and WIKIPEDIA goes by the facts not by any defined website.Every other trade websites other than fallacious BOX office India quotes the same figures.So,Armaan.haider (talk) look into facts before blindly following a particular website and citing Wikipedia's name for it.
WIKIPEDIA goes by truth and not by your favourite BOX OFFICE INDIA.
Reliability of Boxofficeindia.com
editIt seems, after a really long debate back in 2008, that Boxofficeindia is considered by Wikipedia to be a reliable source even thought it is Self-published.
The thread: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 13#Boxofficeindia.com
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:55, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping us clear the air. Appreciate it. Thanks Armaan.haider (talk) 04:48, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2015
edit122.176.16.78 (talk) 10:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC) Total gross box office collection is 260 Crores.. Pls see the link below..
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The plot is too long and also spoils the movie. Also, there are multiple grammatical and spelling errors. JazzKor (talk) 18:23, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Amortias (T)(C) 19:14, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
122.176.16.78 (talk) Under the boxoffice section in the right hand side of the article change the box office collections to 260 Crores rather than 219 crores..source link below..dont provide wrong information pls to people..total worldwide colections are 260 Cr..
|url=http://boxofficeindia.com/Details/art_detail/themusicofpkdoesnotseemifthefirsttwosongsarethebestofthelotsocanitstillbeattherecordsasitisexpectedtodo#.VTd8NNKqqko — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.16.78 (talk) 11:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Worldwide box office
edit₹260 crore (US$31 million)[1]
References
- ^ What is the Worldwide Gross of Bang Bang?, Box Office India, 20 November 2014
Gross
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
₹2.60 billion (US$31 million)122.176.16.78 (talk) 12:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
[1]
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Kharkiv07Talk 14:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ What is the Worldwide Gross of Bang Bang?, Box Office India, 20 November 2014
Format error
editThere is a formating error in the #Production section it should br correct. Thanks
- Yasir72.multan Talk Contribs
20:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 May 2015
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
79.127.85.79 (talk) 16:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Not done as you have not requested a change. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 16:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bang Bang!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140903111223/http://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/meherbaan-the-perfect-romantic-song-from-bang-bang/article1-1259396.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/meherbaan-the-perfect-romantic-song-from-bang-bang/article1-1259396.aspx#sthash.zoeGrDL7.rvJhRWO2.dpuf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Bang Bang! is not an English Film
editMy question is simple. Why is this movie categorized under "English-language Indian films"? It is almost completely in Hindi, and cannot be same as, say, Bollywood Calling, which is completely in English. Moreover, how can a movie be both a Hindi-language as well as an English-language film? A few dialogues spoken in English are virtually in every Hindi/Indian film. So should all Hindi films/Indian films be categorized in both? Interestingly, this movie is categorized under both 2010s Hindi-language films as well as 2010s English-language films. This appears confusing.