Talk:Suffren-class submarine
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Suffren-class submarine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I seriously doubt the SMX Ocean and the Shortfin Barracuda are the same product
edit"A conventionally powered derivative, initially dubbed the SMX-Ocean, now known as the Shortfin Barracuda,[8] was selected as a future replacement for the Collins-class vessels with the Royal Australian Navy.[9]"
This is doubtful, from meretmarine.com (probably the biggest news source in French for naval issues): http://www.meretmarine.com/fr/content/dcns-devoile-un-nouveau-sous-marin-oceanique-dote-de-piles-combustible, the SMX Ocean uses fuel cells and vertical launchers for VL MICA missiles. This is confirmed in commercial videos from DCNS themselves on youtube. The SMX Ocean on the other hand, still on the commercial videos, does not appear to feature pump jets. The Shortfin Barraduca is a casual Barracuda sub with a conventional propulsion and an American combat management system rather than the French one. There's different projects both based on the Barracuda hull. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.68.164.96 (talk) 06:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
PROPULSION?
editPropulsion and power: 2 turboreductors groups (10 MW propulsion alternator feeding electric engines) Nuclear reactor K15, 150 MW 2 emergency electric engines
Are you sure about the power of a K15 reactor? With such a power the submarine should reach more, much more than 40 knots...
Moreover according to my sources a K15 reactor on Le Triumphant or on Charles de Gaulles has a power of only 30 MW (2nd April 2008 by Mario) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.201.51.176 (talk) 20:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Both information are correct ; including CdG witch use the same technologies. v_atekor (talk) 14:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on French Barracuda-class submarine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081112193412/http://www.dcnsgroup.com/files/naval_expert/fr_bd.pdf to http://www.dcnsgroup.com/files/naval_expert/fr_bd.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051220023218/http://navyleague.org:80/sea_power/oct_02_37.php to http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/oct_02_37.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on French Barracuda-class submarine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130917121958/http://www.navyleague.org:80/sea_power/oct_02_37.php to http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/oct_02_37.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080229011712/http://www.dcn.fr:80/us/offre/sous-marins/barracuda.html to http://www.dcn.fr/us/offre/sous-marins/barracuda.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on French Barracuda-class submarine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20051220023218/http://navyleague.org:80/sea_power/oct_02_37.php to http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/oct_02_37.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Shortfin Barracuda
editI think the displacements shown in the side panel for the Shortfin Baracuda are the wrong way round. Normally in submarines the surface weight is lighter than the submerged weight (as it is for the nuke version above it). 1.129.96.196 (talk) 12:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- The displacement figures don't make sense.---Now wiki (talk) 19:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Shortfin Barracuda 4500t surfaced and 4000t submerged ???
editWhere does these numbers come from, they doesn't make any sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.112.232.102 (talk) 15:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on French Barracuda-class submarine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051220023218/http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/oct_02_37.php to http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/oct_02_37.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on French Barracuda-class submarine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140521212804/http://www.netmarine.net/bat/smarins/triompha/index.htm to http://www.netmarine.net/bat/smarins/triompha/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Unusual description of CEA (Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique)
editIn the History paragraph there is the following description of CEA:
"and the Commissariat a l'Énergie Atomique, a regulatory body that oversees nuclear power plants"
I think this description is erroneous as the CEA is more a state controlled research institution for things that have mainly to do with nuclear. Frances regulatory body for nuclear power plants is ASN (autorité de sureté nucléaire) for all civilian nuclear installation (military installation have a specific regime).
(For context : The prototypes for the nuclear reactor of the nuclear subs/aircraft carriers were built in one of the CEA installation, the military Application of CEA was in charge of building the nuclear heads of the French dissuasion force.)
I am unsure of what the best way to describe CEA is in English (not my native language) bur regulatory body is definitely wrong.--128.237.146.192 (talk) 13:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Misleading title
editBarracuda isn't the name of the class but the name of the program of the manufacturer (Naval Group and Avera TA) the official name of the French submarine is Suffren-class, the Australian version is named Attack-class. Here is a reference from a press article following the visit of the shipyard of Cherbourg where the submersibles are constructed. It is stated that the submarines are of Suffren-class from the Barracuda Program. https://www.meretmarine.com/fr/content/sur-le-chantier-des-sous-marins-de-classe-suffren-cherbourg
Misplaced sentence
editThis sentence seems to have been misplaced, probably in a recent edit after Australia changed their mind about buying the Barracuda from France: "The reactors are sealed and last for the lifetime of the submarine because they run on weapons-grade uranium that can be used to make nuclear weapons, unlike the ones France uses which have to be serviced every ten years.[28]" This sentence about the differences between French and American/British nuclear submarines is out of place in the paragraph about the non-nuclear version of the Barracuda. 62.205.90.67 (talk) 06:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)