Talk:Bart's Dog Gets an "F"/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   None provided.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   None Provided.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I had to make two very minor fixes, but all in all, a great article. If you feel this review was in err—take it to GA Review. ceranthor 14:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, Ceranthor! :) TheLeftorium 14:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)