Talk:Bashkir language

Requested move 15 July 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 15:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

---

• Bashkir language → Bashkir
• Bashkir → Bashkir (disambiguation)

– WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:COMMONNAME. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 07:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

• Oppose for now. I'm not convinced that it's the Bashkir language is the primary meaning of "Bashkir" (and not, say, a Bashkir person). Could you elaborate on your reasoning and provide additional information to support it, please?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 15, 2015; 16:00 (UTC)
• Strong oppose no reasoning provided on why this is primary instead of the ethnic group the Bashkirs -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 07:49, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
• Oppose ambiguous title. Khestwol (talk) 09:19, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
• Speedy close. Yet another attempt by Shhhhwwww to subvert NCLANG rather than having an honest discussion there. — kwami (talk) 05:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Two sets of each demonstrative pronoun

Is there a semantic, etymological, pragmatic (etc.) difference between the был/ошо and шул/теге pairs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.118.173.88 (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Bashkir keyboard for smartphone.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:23, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Expand Bashkir

Template:Expand Bashkir has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 02:48, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Nothing, I just misclicked, sorry. Letimo1 (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Declension table

@Letimo1: Hello! What is wrong with the table that you are removing? Please explain. —Alalch E. 18:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

// vs [] for allophones

My edit changing // for [] to indicate allophones was reverted, without any other explanation than "no these are better." Wikipedia and, you know, just linguistics textbooks in general use // for phonemic transcription and [] for narrow transcription (which includes allophones). So allophones are never indicated by //.

@Fdom5997, @Yue, @Bababashqort, @ThatDohDude, @Başqurd Am I wrong with this? Shouldn't we keep this consistent throughout the article, at least, anyway? IlmarisenVasara 01:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Pretty sure the editor who reverted you did so because you did not use the {{IPAblink}} template. I restored your edits with the template; if that was not the reason you were reverted, I am sure other editors will clarify their specific reasons here. Yue🌙 01:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

So to be clear, {{IPAslink}} is for //, and {{IPAblink}} is for []? IlmarisenVasara 01:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

You didn’t put the allophones with . They were transcribed fine but were not properly written the way they should be on Wikipedia. Fdom5997 (talk) 01:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate the clarification. I would have liked this explanation to be on the descriprion of the undoing, but I'm glad we're addressing any confusion. IlmarisenVasara 01:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

@Yue is absolutely right. They needed to be transcribed (like I said) with the template. Fdom5997 (talk) 01:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, I got it, thank you again. Just so you know, whatever you wrote after "with" didn't render properly so I don't see it, but I can gather from context that it's the proper template to use, which I can see anyway from Yue's edit. Sorry for the confusion, I was just looking for some clarification. IlmarisenVasara 01:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)