Talk:English and Welsh bastardy laws
(Redirected from Talk:Bastard (Law of England and Wales))
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Raydann in topic Requested move 22 January 2023
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the English and Welsh bastardy laws article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 22 January 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to alternate title (English and Welsh bastardy laws) to disambiguate from Colonial American bastardy laws (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 10:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Bastard (law of England and Wales) → Bastard (law) – Although the term is specific to English and Welsh law, there are no other legal terms from which to disambiguate. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 00:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Colonial American bastardy laws In ictu oculi (talk) 10:23, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: Relisting to obtain more consensus. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 00:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- @LaundryPizza03: Should this not be disambiguated from Colonial American bastardy laws? Graham (talk) 05:39, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Graham11: You mean like renaming this to English and Welsh bastardy laws and turning Bastard (law) into a WP:BCA? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @LaundryPizza03: I actually wasn't thinking that specifically. (I only meant to enquire as to whether you agree with my [and the other commenter's] inclination that the original proposal seems to just move this article to an ambiguous title. I hadn't thought much beyond that.) But I could definitely imagine a broad-concept article working at the title Bastard (law). And I think moving this article to a title in line with the colonial American one makes sense. What do you think? Graham (talk) 07:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Graham11: Yes. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to support a move to English and Welsh bastardy laws, in that case. Graham (talk) 05:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Graham11: Yes. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @LaundryPizza03: I actually wasn't thinking that specifically. (I only meant to enquire as to whether you agree with my [and the other commenter's] inclination that the original proposal seems to just move this article to an ambiguous title. I hadn't thought much beyond that.) But I could definitely imagine a broad-concept article working at the title Bastard (law). And I think moving this article to a title in line with the colonial American one makes sense. What do you think? Graham (talk) 07:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.