Talk:Second Battle of Fort Wagner

Move?

The link I followed to this page described this as the "Second Battle of Fort Wagner", which seems a more logical title; given also the article on the previous battle is titled the "First battle of Fort Wagner".
So, I propose moving this page to Second Battle of Fort Wagner.
Opinions? Xyl 54 (talk) 13:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

OK, done. Xyl 54 (talk) 13:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Order of Battle

The Order of Battle for this engagement is complicated. A diagram of the deployed units in relationship to the fort and topography would be very useful. Lionelt (talk) 22:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Medal of Honor

This article probably mentions the medal of honor for not letting the flag touch the ground, but not in the aftermath section. Would it be relevant to include it here since the medal was awarded much later, then rescinded then restored?--Senor Freebie (talk) 15:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Numbers

The numbers given for wounded, dead, missing, and others appear to be faulty. Page 42 of the book "On the Altar of Freedom" gives much more accurate numbers on what happened,but this needs to be verified. 67.253.244.112 (talk) 03:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC)S.D.R.

Sometimes

"The 54th Massachusetts, an infantry regiment sometimes composed of African-American soldiers"

Does this mean that the racial makeup of the regiment changed often and that it was usually a composed of white soldiers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloodsportforall (talk • contribs) 14:35, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

"Decisive"???

I'm not sure it is correct to call this a "decisive" victory for the south. (In the summary box). The storming of the fort in July was repulsed. But the battle and the siege continued, and the fort eventually had to be abandoned by the Confederates because of water shortages and continuing union bombardment. I would call it a tactical victory for the south and a strategic victory for the north. But in any case not a "decisive" victory. In the wiki description of Gettysburg there is some debate as to whether the battle was "decisive" but I see much less to debate here. They had to defend the fort, they lost control of it after a prolonged siege. I don't know whether the "battle" should be defined as simply the day of the 54th's assault. The battle of Vicksburg went on for many weeks. If the South did well during one of those weeks you don't say that week was a "decisive" victory for the South. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gn842 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 0 external links on Second Battle of Fort Wagner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bibliobase.com/history/readerscomp/civwar/html/cw_000106_entries.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Second Battle of Fort Wagner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930220109/http://www.historynet.com/magazines/american_civil_war/3035986.html to http://www.historynet.com/magazines/american_civil_war/3035986.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)