Talk:Battle of Nawzad

Nawzad vs Now Zad?

I see that Now Zad has been replaced with Nawzad. I've been spelling it Now Zad as that is what current news agencies are reporting/spelling it as, rather than the previous spelling Nawzad. This may have been the British spelling? Not sure. My opinion is to go with the current spelling. --Ouketi.ego (talk) 01:36, 06 July 2009 (UTC)

When I served in Now Zad in 2006 that was how we spelt it. I would also like to point out that there were on 53 british soldiers stationed there hence why we could never defeat the Taliban. So if a company of 300 US marines is called small what the hell were we? Tangotwozero (talk) 10:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

The spelling of places should be the official woding used by a countries government, used by those living in the location. Unfortunately Media producers and Journalists, sending back reports via video link or text, will usually corrupt place names to how they sound at the time to them. That then gets onto the international media and assumed to be correct by the general public. However, although I have seen 'Nawzad', used in some archived publications, the wording 'Naw Zad' is used on this map [1] produced by the Afghanistan Managment Information Service. It is also the wording used in this 'Asia-Pacific Daily Report' April 9, 2004 (pdf file), also this Asian Media group News website Dawn News, by Google Maps and the Wiki articles Nawzad and Nawzad District. Whilst 'Now Zad' is used on an US Air Force, Defense Mapping Agency Aerospace Center, air navigation map from the 80s:- [2] and Windows Live (Bing Maps). Richard Harvey (talk) 10:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Battle?

It's the longest battle in history? This is campigan, no battle. Omega933 (talk) 16:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Now Zad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090513092217/http://www.marines.mil/units/marforcent/spmagtfa/Pages/NewsStoryPages/2009/USMarinesStrikeInsurgentPositionsinNowZad,Afghanistan.aspx to http://www.marines.mil/units/marforcent/spmagtfa/Pages/NewsStoryPages/2009/USMarinesStrikeInsurgentPositionsinNowZad,Afghanistan.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

British Medics

Battle of Nawzad#Escalation of fighting lists the various british troops onsite, including some from "British Medics." A quick bit of googling didn't help me clarify this to any specific unit, so if anyone has any ideas please fill it in with the appropriate term/link. Thanks! Mehmuffin (talk) 15:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Nawzad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.mil.ee/~fotek/gallery/view_photo.php?full=1&set_albumName=Estcoy-5-patrull-Now-Zadi-alal-19-03-2008&id=aam
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100118123213/http://www.marines.mil/unit/iimef/2ndmeb/Pages/TheresurgenceofNowZad.aspx to http://www.marines.mil/unit/iimef/2ndmeb/Pages/TheresurgenceofNowZad.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)