Talk:Ben Spencer (politician)
Latest comment: 29 days ago by 86.160.95.7 in topic Sparse on biographical information
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
article needs cleanup
editAlmost this entire article needs cleanup. You can tell it's been written by him or a member of his team from the use of first name, political double speak and the fact it's 99% complimentary information PLUS there are almost no sources in the whole article. Note particularly the "constituency priorities" section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SquidSquad77 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Have to agree with this; the article does not meet the NPOV ideal at all. Pcb21 Pete 15:29, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Looking a lot better now that "constituency priorities" has been removed but I still think the political career area needs some work --SquidSquad77 (talk) 01:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The article has had a cleanup and I have removed a lot of unsourced content tonight. The article, in my view, is no longer unbalanced. I have therefore removed the "unbalanced" template at the top of the article. But if any editors have further concerns about WP:NPOV or balance, the template can be restored. Regards, Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- looks good to me, thanks SquidSquad77 (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- The article has had a cleanup and I have removed a lot of unsourced content tonight. The article, in my view, is no longer unbalanced. I have therefore removed the "unbalanced" template at the top of the article. But if any editors have further concerns about WP:NPOV or balance, the template can be restored. Regards, Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Sparse on biographical information
editNothing on parents, upbringing, siblings, spouse(s), partner(s), although two children stated.
Nothing on qualifications required for stated ten years work as a doctor in the NHS.
The article reads as a sparsely sourced CV rather than an encyclopaedic biographical article. 86.160.95.7 (talk) 06:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)