Talk:Bend radius

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

someone forgot the diagram . . . 68.115.227.253 16:29, 12 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Replacement drawing inserted. Buxtehude 02:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Maximum bend radius

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why is the bend radius the maximum radius? The maximum radius is infinity which is a straight line. Oblomov99 (talk) 04:15, 14 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bend Allowance

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bend radius seems more complex than this. If I bend a rod into a circle, the length of the rod is not the same as the circumference of the inside or the outside of the circle. It will not be the average of the two either, because the outside of the rod will stretch more easily than the inside of the rod will compress. I postulate that there is an 'effective circumference' that defines where inside the rod the resulting circumference will be. It seems to be different for different metals and materials, like rubber hoses. "The Fabricator" gives formulas for this. Can anyone help with this? John (talk) https://www.thefabricator.com/thefabricator/article/bending/bending-basics-how-the-inside-bend-radius-forms 03:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC) John (talk) 03:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic