Talk:Beothuk language

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Newfoundland & Labrador Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Newfoundland and Labrador.

Comment

Apparently, the Beothuk word for "(the?) evil spirit" was something like aichmodyim. The resemblance to Asmodeus is striking. I wonder if there is anything to be made of it. A. Shetsen 20:20, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

PS. Although it's surely a coincidence, the fact remains that it's curious. A. Shetsen 06:49, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The external link to the Beothuk song is broken, anybody know where to find this file?

transliteration

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Transliteration can be from words to letters, see dicdef. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:56, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

The definition given is ambiguous (note "corresponding characters of another language or alphabet" - Beothuk had no characters for another system to correspond to) and is from a general purpose dictionary. Dictionaries of linguistics make the difference between transcription and transliteration quite clear: "In the study of writing systems, the conversion of one writing system into another. Each character of the source language is given an equivalent character in the target language...Transliteration needs to be distinguished from transcription, in which the sounds of the source word are conveyed by letters in the target language." transliteration from Crystal, A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, p. 474; and "Any conventional system for representing in one orthography a language which is ordinarily written in a different orthography, normally by merely replacing each character of the ordinary orthography in a uniform manner by some character or sequence of characters in the orthography being used, with no attempt at providing a phonetic or phonemic transcription." transliteration again in Trask, A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology, p. 361 Ergative rlt (talk) 21:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for answering here and for those definitions. I agree transcription is the closer linguistic term. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Likely Misinformation

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't know who or when all of this was added to the article, but the claims that the language is still in use in the intro really need to be rectified on this article, if not verified. I won't mess with the article myself because I am not fully informed on the subject, but considering that most of the article indicates that the language died around the early 19th Century and was never revivied, it's hard for me to trust the claims about it being spoken today, especially without a source. AnyGuy (talk) 21:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic