Info

edit

I'm not great at expressing english nor making good looking subs fitting to the wiki standard, but I will suggest that we get into this, that due to Struensee's removal of censorship in Denmark for a period, made Berlingske Tidende the first uncensored newspaper in the world.

regards 22:11, 13 October 2006 User:83.72.67.112

Move?

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


Berlingske TidendeBerlingske

My uncertainty was an example of apples and oranges. The hesitant response was informed by wrongly conflating WP:Move and WP:Merge. I wondered about non-specific problems which might develop from merging Berlingske Tidende and Det Berlingske Officin. In other words, I was concerned about consequences of a non-issue.

After pondering the problem for a few hours, my fundamental mistake became plain. --Tenmei (talk) 23:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Berlingske. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Berlingske. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Berlingske. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Mendel Levin Nathanson is mentioned but there are no links to websites giving information about him. There are several such websites.S. Valkemirer (talk) 04:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Tanten etc.

edit

Tanten, Tanten i Pilestræde and Tanten i Pilestraede all redirect here, but this nickname (I assume that's what it is) isn't mentioned anywhere in the article. Can a mention be added so the connection is clearer? "Tanten" in particular seems like it has a lot of meanings unrelated to Berlingske, so the redirect seems especially likely to cause confusion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've now added a mention of Tanten i Pilestræde, which could do with a look from someone who actually speaks the language, and will take Tanten to WP:RFD as it doesn't seem commonly used enough to be a useful redirect. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Tanten" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tanten. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 13#Tanten until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply