Talk:CSA T20 Challenge
(Redirected from Talk:Betway T20 Challenge)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lennart97 in topic Requested move 16 June 2021
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 16 June 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Betway T20 Challenge to CSA T20 Challenge. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 16 June 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 14:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Betway T20 Challenge → CSA T20 Challenge – Remove sponsor name, as per our long standing consensus for cricket league article names to exclude sponsor names. There seem to have been a number of undiscussed moves on this page, and so best to do this as a formal move request. But adding sponsor names violates WP:NOTADVERTISING. And we don't usually use sponsor names in cricket tournaments e.g. Big Bash League, Women's Cricket Super League, discussion for Pakistani T20 leagues at Talk:2004–05 National Twenty20 Cup#Requested move 9 March 2021. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:40, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support Whilst a bold move, I think it's misleading to (re)brand all the historic editions of this as the Betway T20 Challenge. Compare with New Zealand's Super Smash, which has similar move discussions. Who could forget the 2015–16 Georgie Pie Super Smash season! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per nom and Lugnuts. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 08:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.