Talk:Mountain bike trials
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Talk:Bike trials riding was copied or moved into Talk:Mountain bike trials on 11 March 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Please post new comments at the bottom of the page to avoid confusion, and make headings using two equal signs (==). Remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you! |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Ads in external links
editSome of the external links look distinctly like adverts to me, for example:
- Cleanbikes - The UK's leading stockist of Monty bikes and spares.
- Iolo bikes - A leading new manafacturer of custom trials frames in the UK
Any thoughts? -- Lordandmaker 20:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I've already deleted a few external links that were either local bike stores or personal trials sites of no use whatsoever. I left Cleanbikes as they're a major player in UK trials sales, and I was undecided about IOLO bikes. -- Urbanpoet 02:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've added a spam cleanup notice, removed the IOLO bikes link after checking the site, It breaks the wiki rules, got rid of the random bold links. But I am unsure about cleanbikes, due to their position Organising BikeTrial events. I think for the article depth there are too many external links. -- Alexx 16:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure the Trialspain is entirely relevant on the English wikipedia, and i don't think trialsshack is appropriate either, given that it's just a media host. I would suggest limiting the links to one forum and/or governing body per english language country, using whatever's got the widest ranging and appropriate information where theres a decision to be made. This seems, to me, to be the fairest way to do it. -- Lordandmaker 18:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think that the links need stripping down, a lot of them were added by site owners new to wikipedia after this wiki was posted on a forum -- Alexx 19:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
I propose that no commercial sites be linked unless they clearly provide information on bike trials, or the company behind the site is referenced in the article for a legitimate noncommercial reason such as widely accepted contributions to the sport. I know that one might be tempted to provide links for people getting into the sport to buy equipment but I think that the trials forums and other sites provide an easy gateway to that information. Also many of the pertinent trials retailers advertise their services quite clearly on these sites. Justtysen (talk) 07:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Expansion Todo
editI think this article has many possible areas of expansion, like;
- New Section covering the different evolved styles
- More in depth information on how trials bikes are specialized, (expansion of current section)
I will make a start! Alexx 17:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
You could also add:
- info on key trial personalities (e.g. Martyn Ashton, Tongue Bros.),
- possibly add the importance of Newbury, Berkshire as a hub for the development of trials riding in the early 2000s,
- seminal videos such as Chainspotting and,
- important frames such as the Azonic DS1 and Pashley 26Mhz
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.133.0.14 (talk • contribs)
Article main picture
editI personally couldn't think of a more horrible, less representative picture for trials. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.213.173.115 (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Trialsinoir
editThe section of 'Trialsinoir - aka Street' is completly fabricated, and so blatently made-up. A complete deletion of the whole section is required and probably replacing with a section about general street riding.
The "Modstock" category should also specify that these type of trials bikes also have Mod bike (116 or 110 mm) dropout spacing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.162.109.161 (talk) 01:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
"It is completely different from individual time trial races, which are an element of road bicycle racing."
lol whuttt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.90.43 (talk) 13:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
"Mountain bike trials"?
editIs the name really widely used? Are 20" trial bikes called "Mountainbikes"? If Bike trial is a part of Mountainbiking, "UCI Mountain Bike & Trials World Championships" seems strange. 丁 (talk) 13:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
picture showing small chain-ring
editThe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MTB_Trials_6_Stevage.jpg picture doesn't clearly show the small chain-ring. it's because the photo was taken from the top of the bike. And the picture became smaller when put on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_bike_trials#Bike_design
If there is another photo that taken from the right side of the bike, then it would be a better one I guess. (Wisnuops (talk) 17:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC))
File:MTB Trials 3 Stevage.jpg to appear as POTD soon
editHello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:MTB Trials 3 Stevage.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 16, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-02-16. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 23:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Add Vittorio Brumotti's records — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.37.192.129 (talk) 11:46, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Section request
editCould coverage be granted to the specific moves/tricks and the associated techniques used in the sport? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.92.1.48 (talk) 05:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mountain bike trials. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091030191144/http://www.uci.ch/Modules/BUILTIN/getObject.asp?MenuId=MTkzNg&ObjTypeCode=FILE&type=FILE&id=34595&LangId=1 to http://www.uci.ch/Modules/BUILTIN/getObject.asp?MenuId=MTkzNg&ObjTypeCode=FILE&type=FILE&id=34595&LangId=1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100509071954/http://www.uci.ch/Modules/BUILTIN/getObject.asp?MenuId=&ObjTypeCode=FILE&type=FILE&id=34595&LangId=1 to http://www.uci.ch/Modules/BUILTIN/getObject.asp?MenuId=&ObjTypeCode=FILE&type=FILE&id=34595&LangId=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)