Talk:Billiken

Latest comment: 11 months ago by 108.26.160.33 in topic Charm doll

Untitled

edit

I can't figure out how to make the footnotes work automatically. Can someone fix it up for me? Stephen Aquila 03:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I suggest that this article be updated for the lack of articles. As noted by the most definitive sources on the origin, the Billiken is refered to with "the" and "a", marking that the Billiken is not treated like a singular being but a type of character. Quippe 05:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

The article says "The Billiken should not be confused with baby-like Kewpie figures that debuted in the December 1909 Ladies' Home Journal." I most certainly think it should be confused with the Kewpie. The look startlingly similar. It should not be referred to as a Kewpie. But certainly confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.201.45 (talk) 17:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Trademark/Copyright

edit

Article says the Billiken doll was the first copyrighted doll. I suspect that the term 'trademarked' is meant here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.153.241.162 (talk) 20:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I know of no proof that the billiken was named after William Howard Taft, and would like to know where this idea comes from. There were little statues called "Billy Can" and Billy Can't" that sat on toilet seats, and it makes the most sense that the word "billiken" is derived from Billy Can, and the posture of the billiken is adapted from the Billy Can sitting on the toilet, smiling proudly... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weisner (talkcontribs) 17:50, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, signing outWeisner (talk) 21:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Weisner. There is nothing in the William Howard Taft wikilink that suggests Billiken was named after Taft. Thus, the reference to Billiken/Taft needs to be withdrawn or cited. I have placed a "citation requested" tag appropriately. 24.170.225.180 (talk) 20:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Chairman Cigarettes

edit

A match-holder in the form of a porcelain figure of a billiken was used by R.J. Lea, a Manchester (U.K.) cigarette company to promote `Chairman'-brand cigars and cigarettes in tobacconist shops. I have only a website and personal observations to support this, but if anyone has reliable sources on this subject, they may wish to add these facts to the article. Barney Bruchstein (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ranma vs. Billiken

edit

I have deleted the mention to the Ranma movie. Is not significative, as many other mangas/animes with the Seven Gods did not talk about Billiken, too. --213.37.241.232 (talk) 16:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

A strange error

edit

When the park closed in 2018, the wooden statue of the Billiken went missing.

Oops... --Sergeirichard (talk) 08:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Erroneous Crocodile Dundee reference

edit

I removed the sentences, "In the movie Crocodile Dundee, the Paul Hogan character Mick Dundee says to the cab driver, 'Get on the right side of the road, you Billiken.' Australians may be familiar with the word Billiken based on the 1910 song produced there titled "My Little Billiken" by Sadie D'astro with music by James E. Dodd."

First of all, the line uttered by Paul Hogan's character is, "Get on the right side of the road, you pelican," not Billiken. Second, the sentences were under the section about the Billiken as a sports mascot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelogan (talkcontribs) 22:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

A further source

edit

I don't want to plunge into working on this article, but for whoever is working on it, a useful source:

  • Dorothy Jean Ray, "The Mystery of the Billiken", Alaska magazine, September 1960. Online version. Also reprinted in Jill Shepherd (ed.), The Last Frontier: Incredible Tales of Survival, Exploration, and Adventure from Alaska Magazine. Globe Pequot, 2004, ISBN 1592285686.

- Jmabel | Talk 19:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I see, it's there, just referenced confusingly in the external links, and not alluded to in the body of the article. This needs cleanup. Guess I'll try to do at least some of it. - Jmabel | Talk 19:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
OK, the Ray article is now cited more cleanly. Our article could still use enormous work in terms of citation and probably general cleanup. - Jmabel | Talk 04:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Billiken. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Billiken. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Is Billiken a deity?

edit

Serious question. Is Billiken considered by theologists as a deity, like many short-lived others before and after that period? Syced (talk) 07:14, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Charm doll

edit

The introductory sentence says Billiken is a "charm doll", but the link just goes to the page on dolls in general. What does this phrase mean? Can it be clarified? 108.26.160.33 (talk) 16:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply