Talk:Bin Jawad District

Requested Move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. No significant opposition to the move. --regentspark (comment) 15:34, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Bin Jawwad District → Bin Jawad District – Most sources seem to use Bin Jawad, rather than Bin Jawwad as well as most of the other articles and topics on wikipedia itself. Also, Bin Jawad has more hits on google than Bin Jawwad, or any other the other name variations. Only one article actually linked to Bin Jawwad, the rest linked to Bin Jawad and redirected to Bin Jawwad. Jeancey (talk) 19:26, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

• Comment It looks like this is largely a problem of transliteration of the Arabic. Before we go any further, can we have the DIN transliteration of the original name? Skinsmoke (talk) 03:03, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bin Jawad District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081220214410/http://gpco.gov.ly/online/shabyat.php to http://gpco.gov.ly/online/shabyat.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)