Talk:Blanca Peak

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Mountains Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent revert re: Poncha Pass

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I reinstated the bit about Poncha Pass, since it's correct. Note that it does not say that Blanca is separated by only Poncha Pass from the Sawatch Range. The point is that this statement, in context, is to clarify the reason for the large topographic prominence of Blanca; if you are confused about this you should take a look at that page or ask about it here. Thanks-- Spireguy 02:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blanca Peak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060814180907/http://www.lapahie.com:80/Sacred_Mts.cfm to http://www.lapahie.com/Sacred_Mts.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Switched the Tewa & Ute names in the first section.

Latest comment: 5 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I noticed that the 'th' digraph didn't make sense for a Ute word, checked Ute phonology to confirm, then noticed that in this article, the Ute and Tewa names were switched in the introduction when compared to the "Historical Names" section.

Considering 'th' is a digraph in the Romanization of Tewa, I believe the change is correct, and it at least makes the article consistent. 2600:1700:A710:BCE0:359C:7222:3D8C:D073 (talk) 04:20, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic