Wikipedia

Talk:Blind Man's Zoo

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
Learn more about this page
Good articleBlind Man's Zoo has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 13, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
January 12, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Each song is a reference to a hot-topic political issue

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please elaborate. A hot political topic in 1989 is not readily discernable from a title like "Headstrong." --Fantailfan 23:07, 29 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Blind Man's Zoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blind Man's Zoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

'On the week ending' / chart performance section

edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

just a suggestion- wording in the chart performance section with the phrase 'on the week ending' is awkward- it would make more sense as a group of charts, similar to this one. alex! (talk) 19:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

my bad- i meant that having both the chart performance section and the charts section is kind of redundant, i think it might be easier to read if the information from the chart performance section was added to the charts section, maybe as a separate week-based chart? alex! (talk) 19:07, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago119 comments3 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Blind Man's Zoo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 05:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

On first glance, this article looks alright and does have a number of unsourced claims but they are not sentences plus they are not any citation failed tags, so this does not get quick failed for sure! --K. Peake 05:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit

Production and songs

edit
  • Retitle to Themes and lyrics
  • The first two paragraphs of this should be in a different section titled Background and development, which will come before the retitled one in this order
  • "Members of the band 10,000 Maniacs were, at the time of the album's release, singer-songwriter" → "At the time of Blind Man's Zoo being released, the members of 10,000 Maniacs were; American singer-songwriter"
  • [1] should only be invoked at the end of the paragraph since it backs up every single sentence of this one
  • "Christian Burial Music; followed by an LP titled The Wishing Chair after signing contract" → "Christian Burial Music. The releases were followed by 10,000 Maniac's second studio album The Wishing Chair, after they signed a contract"
  • "In My Tribe, released in July 1987, became modestly successful," → "In My Tribe was released in July 1987 and became modestly successful,"
  • "was recorded in" → "was recorded at"
  • "The ballad "Trouble Me" (track four), the album's first track to be released as a single, was co-written" → "The ballad "Trouble Me", which is the fourth track, was written" with the target since the single info is irrelevant for this area; I will tell you where to place it instead though
  • George Ho Even though you have since changed part of this sentence, some of the prose I requested for it like not putting (track four) are yet to be fixed; I have noticed at other points in the article, so please make sure you are looking at everything properly. --K. Peake 20:27, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "Dennis Drew and Natalie Merchant for Merchant's father," → "Drew and Merchant for the latter's father,"
  • "provided the background vocals" → "provides background vocals"
  • "Other songs on the album" → "Numerous songs on Blind Man's Zoo
  • "who is five-months pregnant." → "that is five-months pregnant."
  • "did not intend the song" → "did not intend for the song"
  • "Rob Buck played the guitar" → "Buck played the guitar"
  • "the song; Jerome Augustyniak, percussion." → "the song, while percussion was performed by Augustyniak."
  • Remove the singles sentence from here
  • "The second track, "Please Forgive Us"," → "The album's second track, "Please Forgive Us"," and this belongs in the above para instead
  • [4] should solely be at the end of the sentence before [7]
  • [1] should solely be at the end of the sentence before [2]
  • "The seventh track "Poison in the Well" concerns" → "The seventh track, "Poison in the Well", concerns"
  • [1] should solely be at the end of the sentence before [4]
  • "is about the working class." → "is about the working class, centering around the plight of them."
  • "The tenth track "Hateful Hate" concerns" → ""Hateful Hate", the tenth track of Blind Man's Zoo, concerns"
  • "and racial tensions" → "as well as racial tensions"
  • "The final track "Jubilee" is" → "The final track, "Jubilee", is"
  • [3] should solely be at the end of the sentence before [7]
  • "and concerns a racist" → "and is about a racist"
  • "a dance hall in which he had" → "a dance hall, in which he had"
  • The music videos para should not be in this section
  • "Music videos of "Eat for Two," "Trouble Me," "You Happy Puppet," "Dust Bowl,"" → "Music videos for "Eat for Two", "Trouble Me", "You Happy Puppet", "Dust Bowl"," with the wikilink
  • "were released in a" → "were included on the"
  • [8] should solely be at the end of the sentence
  • Add ref(s) to back up the re-release info
  • "bonus music videos from the band's" → "bonus videos from the band's 1993"
  • "in which the band" → "during which they"

Release and promotion

edit
  • Create this section directly after Themes and lyrics, starting a sentence stating the release date of the album
  • The singles info from the previous sections belongs here, as does the music videos info and add more if you can like the proper release dates
  • Still make the prose changes I suggested for the content proposed to be moved, though I may suggest further changes after you have created this section
  • After checking the DVD re-release's tracklist (via Amazon), I eliminated one unverifiable clause and rewrote the other clause as independent sentence. I can't be too sure whether an inline citation or a secondary source is needed when the live album MTV Unplugged is already used as a source. --George Ho (talk) 00:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Reception

edit
  • Retitle to Critical reception
  • Refs in the ratings template should be invoked after the scores instead of the sources
  • Add "Blind Man's Zoo was met with mixed to positive reviews from music critics" as the opening sentence with the target
  • "said the track "Trouble Me" is "the most uplifting"" → "said "Trouble Me" is "the most uplifting track"" if that is what the source directly says; elsewise, put [track]
  • "called the album the band's" → "called the album 10,000 Maniac's"
  • "Spin journalist Jonathan Van Meter considered" → "Spin journalist, Jonathan Van Meter considered"
  • "Rob Buck's guitar performance" → "Buck's guitar performance"
  • "also called the "Jubilee"" → "further called "Jubilee""
  • "Allmusic reviewer Chris Woodstra rated the album three-and-a-half stars out of five, considering it" → "AllMusic reviewer Chris Woodstra considered the album"
  • Remove wikilink on In My Tribe
  • "[the album] ultimately" → "[Blind Man's Zoo] ultimately"
  • For this review, don't have the star rating written out in prose and instead quote the review here
  • Do the same for the following Rolling Stone review and the only Robert Christgau in this article
  • "Another Rolling Stone reviewer J.D. Considine rated it three out of five and wrote that" → "J.D. Considine, reviewing for the same publication, wrote that"
  • The certifications info belongs in Commercial performance instead
  • "was certified Gold (500,000 units) on July 11, 1989 and then Platinum (1,000,000 units)" → "was certified gold for selling 500,000 units in the US on July 11, 1989 and then platinum for sales of 1,000,000 units in the country"
  • [14] should solely be at the end of the sentence before [15] and should use a refname from the cert table
  • "it the band's fourth album to be certified Platinum." → "it 10,000 Maniac's fourth album to achieve the certification."

Chart performance

edit
  • Retitle to Commercial performance
  • "In the United States, Blind Man's Zoo reached number 13 in the Billboard Top 200 chart" → "In the US, Blind Man's Zoo reached number 13 on the Billboard 200"
  • [16] is the correct ref but this should be using a refname from the chart table and place solely at the end of the sentence before [17]
  • Add the RIAA certification directly after this
  • "at number 18 in" → "at number 18 on"
  • [18] should solely be at the end of the sentence before [19]
  • Write about the BPI certification for the following sentence
  • "In the Billboard charts," → "On the US charts,"
  • "number 20 in the" → "number 20 at the"
  • Target should be solely on Mainstream Rock
  • "number three in the" → "number 3 on the" per MOS:NUM
  • Target should be solely on Modern Rock Tracks
  • "and number seven in the" → "and number 7 on the"
  • Target should be solely on Adult Contemporary
  • "reached number 77 in the" → "reached number 77 on the"
  • [18] should solely be at the end of the sentence before [24]
  • The last para should be part of the second instead
  • "reached number 12 in" → "reached number 12 on"
  • [18][21] should solely be at the end of the sentence before [25]

Track listing

edit
  • This should be laid out with the template that is usually used for track listings, though still keep the sides separated
  • The writers note is pointless since more than five had multiple writers and when this is in the template, list the writer(s) for every song
  • A source is required for the credits

Personnel

edit
  • A source is required here
  • Use the div col template for separation
  • Any specific order here?

Charts

edit
  • Remove album header
  • See MOS:TABLECAPTION
  • This should be cited as a normal chart table with the chart history templates; this can be used for citing the US refname I referenced in this review
  • Remove the singles charts

Certifications

edit
  • Cite as a normal certifications table; see Template:Certification Table Entry if you are unsure how to
  • See MOS:TABLECAPTION
  • Add the UK certification by BPI
  • The gold and platinum certifications are not both needed, only cite the platinum one here
  • The platinum certification here can be used for the refname I referenced earlier in the review

References

edit
  • Make sure all of these are archived by using the tool
  • Copyvio score looks slick at 9.1%!
  • Some of these are missing publisher/website and accessdates; give these to any sources that can have them added, i.e not the likes of the cassette and CD ones
  • Target Timothy White to Timothy White (writer) on ref 2 and target Spin to Spin (magazine)
  • Target Elektra to Elektra Records on ref 5
  • Target People to People (magazine) on ref 7
  • Cite Thomas Gale as the author for ref 8 and remove him from publisher, placing his surname before forename for consistency
  • Allmusic → AllMusic on ref 9 with the wikilink
  • Wikilink Chicago Tribune on ref 10
  • Wikilink The New Rolling Stone Album Guide on ref 13
  • Target Billboard to Billboard (magazine) on ref 15
  • Solely cite Official Charts Company for ref 18 with the wikilink, as publisher
  • Ditto for refs 19, 24 and 25 but with no wikilinking
  • Ref 21's title appears to have not been filled in properly
  • David Roberts' name is ordered incorrectly on ref 26 and target Guinness World Records Limited to Guinness World Records

Final comments and verdict

edit
  •   On hold even though the article is not too well crafted currently, I have confidence that you can fix these issues in a week and if I have not estimated properly then this may end up being failed. --K. Peake 13:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • ✗ Fail for this article now since not only has it been over a week and you have not fixed the large amount of issues in time, but I have made comments to you directly days ago that you have not responded to at all. --K. Peake 05:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago80 comments2 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Blind Man's Zoo/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 06:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

I will take this on for review, as it would be appropriate for me to get the article into GA status potentially because I conducted the first review; I will use that one here to help me somewhat! --K. Peake 06:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit

Background and development

edit

Themes and lyrics

edit

Release and promotion

edit

Critical reception

edit

Commercial performance

edit

Track listing

edit

Personnel

edit
  • Add "Credits are adapted from the album's booklet." at the top of this section, making that the sole place where [2] is invoked
  • ("Trouble Me") → (track 4)

Charts

edit

Certifications

edit

References

edit
edit

Final comments and verdict

edit
  •   On hold for a week until the issues are fixed, but the article is a lot better from when I reviewed it the first time; props for your progress, and hopefully you can get everything done in less than a week! --K. Peake 09:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Blind_Man%27s_Zoo&oldid=1211157873"